Philip A. Freeman

1.0k total citations
69 papers, 763 citations indexed

About

Philip A. Freeman is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip A. Freeman has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 763 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 27 papers in Environmental Engineering and 26 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Philip A. Freeman's work include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (30 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (26 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (26 papers). Philip A. Freeman is often cited by papers focused on Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (30 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (26 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (26 papers). Philip A. Freeman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Egypt. Philip A. Freeman's co-authors include Emil D. Attanasi, Richard F. Meyer, Matthew D. Merrill, Sean T. Brennan, Robert A. Burruss, Leslie F. Ruppert, Timothy C. Coburn, Peter D. Warwick, Celeste D. Lohr and Madalyn S. Blondes and has published in prestigious journals such as Science Advances, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering and International journal of greenhouse gas control.

In The Last Decade

Philip A. Freeman

60 papers receiving 664 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip A. Freeman United States 11 326 307 255 221 142 69 763
Nicholas A. Azzolina United States 17 308 0.9× 356 1.2× 215 0.8× 244 1.1× 57 0.4× 44 895
Guenther Glatz Saudi Arabia 19 420 1.3× 424 1.4× 515 2.0× 403 1.8× 134 0.9× 48 1.2k
Timothy B. Fischer United States 13 322 1.0× 109 0.4× 582 2.3× 250 1.1× 83 0.6× 22 854
Daniel J. Soeder United States 19 573 1.8× 316 1.0× 877 3.4× 651 2.9× 67 0.5× 45 1.4k
Vello Kuuskraa United States 13 454 1.4× 463 1.5× 338 1.3× 397 1.8× 43 0.3× 52 951
Jeremy K. Domen United States 9 99 0.3× 147 0.5× 167 0.7× 172 0.8× 54 0.4× 14 649
Ernie Perkins Canada 15 216 0.7× 622 2.0× 292 1.1× 215 1.0× 21 0.1× 28 752
John A. Harju United States 18 846 2.6× 548 1.8× 715 2.8× 676 3.1× 76 0.5× 66 1.3k
Kevin G. Mumford Canada 20 235 0.7× 496 1.6× 106 0.4× 153 0.7× 22 0.2× 69 923
Zhichao Yu China 14 224 0.7× 331 1.1× 326 1.3× 206 0.9× 31 0.2× 38 617

Countries citing papers authored by Philip A. Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip A. Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip A. Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip A. Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip A. Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip A. Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip A. Freeman. The network helps show where Philip A. Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip A. Freeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip A. Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip A. Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip A. Freeman. Philip A. Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Merrill, Matthew D., Benjamin M. Sleeter, & Philip A. Freeman. (2024). Federal lands greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration in the United States: Estimates for 2005–22. Scientific investigations report. 1 indexed citations
2.
Attanasi, Emil D. & Philip A. Freeman. (2023). Reconnaissance Survey for Potential Energy Storage and Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources of Petroleum Reservoirs in Western Europe. Natural Resources Research. 32(4). 1839–1858.
3.
Anderson, Steven T., Sean T. Brennan, Erick R. Burns, et al.. (2023). Geologic energy storage. Fact sheet. 1 indexed citations
4.
Merrill, Matthew D., et al.. (2023). Analysis of the United States documented unplugged orphaned oil and gas well dataset. 9 indexed citations
5.
Karacan, C. Özgen, Sean T. Brennan, Philip A. Freeman, et al.. (2023). A residual oil zone (ROZ) assessment methodology with application to the central basin platform (Permian Basin, USA) for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and long-term geologic CO2 storage. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 230. 212275–212275. 9 indexed citations
6.
Warwick, Peter D., Emil D. Attanasi, Ricardo A. Olea, et al.. (2019). A probabilistic assessment methodology for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery and associated carbon dioxide retention. Scientific investigations report. 3 indexed citations
7.
Craddock, William H., Matthew D. Merrill, Sean T. Brennan, et al.. (2018). Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources—Atlantic Coastal Plain and Eastern Mesozoic Rift Basins. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 1 indexed citations
10.
Brennan, Sean T., Jacob A. Covault, William H. Craddock, et al.. (2014). Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: U.S. Gulf Coast. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 3 indexed citations
11.
Merrill, Matthew D., William H. Craddock, Sean T. Brennan, et al.. (2014). Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: Williston Basin, Central Montana Basins, and Montana Thrust Belt study areas. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 1 indexed citations
12.
Craddock, William H., et al.. (2013). Geologic framework for the national assessment of carbon dioxide storage resources: Arkoma Basin, Kansas Basins, and Midcontinent Rift Basin study areas. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 1 indexed citations
13.
Klett, Timothy R., Troy A. Cook, Ronald R. Charpentier, et al.. (2012). Assessment of potential additions to conventional oil and gas resources of the world (outside the United States) from reserve growth, 2012. Fact sheet. 4 indexed citations
14.
Tennyson, Marilyn E., Troy A. Cook, Ronald R. Charpentier, et al.. (2012). Assessment of remaining recoverable oil in selected major oil fields of the Permian Basin, Texas and New Mexico. Fact sheet. 4 indexed citations
16.
Tennyson, Marilyn E., Troy A. Cook, Ronald R. Charpentier, et al.. (2012). Assessment of remaining recoverable oil in selected major oil fields of the San Joaquin Basin, California. Fact sheet. 1 indexed citations
18.
Klett, Timothy R., Emil D. Attanasi, Ronald R. Charpentier, et al.. (2011). New U.S. Geological Survey method for the assessment of reserve growth. Scientific investigations report. 1 indexed citations
19.
Brennan, Sean T., Robert A. Burruss, Matthew D. Merrill, Philip A. Freeman, & Leslie F. Ruppert. (2010). A probabilistic assessment methodology for the evaluation of geologic carbon dioxide storage. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 105 indexed citations
20.
Burruss, Robert A., Sean T. Brennan, Philip A. Freeman, et al.. (2009). Development of a probabilistic assessment methodology for evaluation of carbon dioxide storage. Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026