P.G.M. Peer
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Oncology top 10%
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 5
- Oncology 6
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening 3
- Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology 1
- HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research 1
- Co-authors
- Koop Bosscha (3 shared papers)M.F. Ernst (2 shared papers)Raquel F. D. van la Parra (2 shared papers)R.P. Groenendijk (2 shared papers)Th. Wobbes (2 shared papers)Vivianne C. G. Tjan‐Heijnen (1 shared paper)F. Van den Berkmortel (1 shared paper)Agnès J. van de Wouw (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Journal of Medical Screening (1 paper)Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (1 paper)European Journal of Cancer (1 paper)European Journal of Surgical Oncology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
P.G.M. Peer
9 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cancer Research 199
- Oncology 257
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 84
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 141
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 47
Countries citing papers authored by P.G.M. Peer
This map shows the geographic impact of P.G.M. Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.G.M. Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.G.M. Peer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P.G.M. Peer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.G.M. Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.G.M. Peer. The network helps show where P.G.M. Peer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside P.G.M. Peer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 169 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 2 |
About P.G.M. Peer
P.G.M. Peer is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Oncology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (1 paper), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (1 paper) and Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (199 citations), Oncology (257 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (84 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (141 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (47 citations). P.G.M. Peer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Koop Bosscha, M.F. Ernst, Raquel F. D. van la Parra, R.P. Groenendijk, Th. Wobbes, Vivianne C. G. Tjan‐Heijnen, F. Van den Berkmortel, Agnès J. van de Wouw, Frank Peters and C. Boetes. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Journal of Medical Screening, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, European Journal of Cancer and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.