Petter Helgesson

952 total citations
18 papers, 220 citations indexed

About

Petter Helgesson is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Radiation and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Petter Helgesson has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 220 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 17 papers in Radiation and 14 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Petter Helgesson's work include Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (18 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (17 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (13 papers). Petter Helgesson is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (18 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (17 papers) and Nuclear Materials and Properties (13 papers). Petter Helgesson collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Netherlands and Switzerland. Petter Helgesson's co-authors include Henrik Sjöstrand, D. Rochman, A. J. Koning, S. Pomp, S.C. van der Marck, W. Zwermann, B. Krzykacz-Hausmann, Michael Österlund, Jesper Rydén and M. Lantz and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Review of Scientific Instruments and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

Petter Helgesson

18 papers receiving 216 citations

Peers

Petter Helgesson

RADIA

NHEP

SPU

R.D. McKnight United States

Andrej Trkov Austria

Michael E Dunn United States

Germina Ilas United States

F. Álvarez‐Velarde Spain

S. Ganesan India

Scott Palmtag United States

V. Bécares Spain

F.B. Brown United States

Z. Yasin Pakistan

R.D. McKnight United States

Petter Helgesson

179 ×0.9

140 ×0.9

RADIA

115 ×0.9

23 ×0.6

NHEP

10 ×0.5

SPU

Citations per year, relative to Petter Helgesson Petter Helgesson (= 1×) peers R.D. McKnight

Countries citing papers authored by Petter Helgesson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Petter Helgesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petter Helgesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petter Helgesson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Petter Helgesson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petter Helgesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petter Helgesson. The network helps show where Petter Helgesson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Petter Helgesson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Petter Helgesson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Petter Helgesson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Petter Helgesson. Petter Helgesson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Sjöstrand, Henrik, et al.. (2018). Efficient use of Monte Carlo: the fast correlation coefficient. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 15–15. 3 indexed citations

Helgesson, Petter & Henrik Sjöstrand. (2018). Treating model defects by fitting smoothly varying model parameters: Energy dependence in nuclear data evaluation. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 120. 35–47. 11 indexed citations

Sjöstrand, Henrik, S. Conroy, Petter Helgesson, et al.. (2017). Propagation of nuclear data uncertainties for fusion power measurements. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations

Helgesson, Petter, Henrik Sjöstrand, & D. Rochman. (2017). Uncertainty-driven nuclear data evaluation including thermal (n, α ) applied to 59 Ni. Nuclear Data Sheets. 145. 1–24. 12 indexed citations

Helgesson, Petter & Henrik Sjöstrand. (2017). Fitting a defect non-linear model with or without prior, distinguishing nuclear reaction products as an example. Review of Scientific Instruments. 88(11). 115114–115114. 8 indexed citations

Helgesson, Petter, Henrik Sjöstrand, A. J. Koning, et al.. (2016). Combining Total Monte Carlo and Unified Monte Carlo: Bayesian nuclear data uncertainty quantification from auto-generated experimental covariances. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 96. 76–96. 21 indexed citations

Sjöstrand, Henrik, Petter Helgesson, Michael Österlund, et al.. (2016). Selecting benchmarks for reactor simulations: An application to a lead fast reactor. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 96. 158–169. 10 indexed citations

Al-Adili, Ali, Petter Helgesson, A. J. Koning, et al.. (2015). Fission Activities of the Nuclear Reactions Group in Uppsala. Physics Procedia. 64. 145–149. 2 indexed citations

Helgesson, Petter, et al.. (2015). Incorporating Experimental Information in the Total Monte Carlo Methodology Using File Weights. Nuclear Data Sheets. 123. 214–219. 12 indexed citations

10.

Sjöstrand, Henrik, et al.. (2015). On the use of integral experiments for uncertainty reduction of reactor macroscopic parameters within the TMC methodology. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 88. 43–52. 14 indexed citations

11.

Helgesson, Petter, Henrik Sjöstrand, A. J. Koning, et al.. (2015). Including experimental information in TMC using file weights from automatically generated experimental covariance matrices. 1 indexed citations

12.

Pomp, S., Ali Al-Adili, Petter Helgesson, et al.. (2015). Experiments and Theoretical Data for Studying the Impact of Fission Yield Uncertainties on the Nuclear Fuel Cycle with TALYS/GEF and the Total Monte Carlo Method. Nuclear Data Sheets. 123. 220–224. 6 indexed citations

13.

Helgesson, Petter, Henrik Sjöstrand, A. J. Koning, et al.. (2015). Sampling of systematic errors to estimate likelihood weights in nuclear data uncertainty propagation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 807. 137–149. 3 indexed citations

14.

Sjöstrand, Henrik, Petter Helgesson, A. J. Koning, et al.. (2014). Uncertainty and correlation analysis of lead nuclear data on reactor parameters for the European Lead Cooled Training Reactor. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 75. 26–37. 17 indexed citations

15.

Sjöstrand, Henrik, Petter Helgesson, S. Pomp, et al.. (2014). Selecting benchmarks for reactor calculations.. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 3 indexed citations

16.

Helgesson, Petter, et al.. (2014). UO₂ versus MOX: Propagated Nuclear Data Uncertainty for k_eff, with Burnup. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 177(3). 321–336. 24 indexed citations

17.

Rochman, D., W. Zwermann, S.C. van der Marck, et al.. (2014). Efficient Use of Monte Carlo: Uncertainty Propagation. Nuclear Science and Engineering. 177(3). 337–349. 68 indexed citations

18.

Helgesson, Petter. (2013). UO-2 vs MOX: Propagated nuclear data uncertainty with burnup using Fast Total Monte Carlo. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact