This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Winship's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Winship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Winship more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Winship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Winship. The network helps show where Peter Winship may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Winship
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Winship.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Winship based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Winship. Peter Winship is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Winship, Peter. (2015). The Hague Principles, the CISG, and the 'Battle of Forms'. eYLS (Yale Law School). 4(1). 151.2 indexed citations
2.
Winship, Peter. (2015). Law and Development in West and Central Africa (OHADA). SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University).1 indexed citations
3.
Winship, Peter & Louise Ellen Teitz. (2006). Developments in Private International Law: Facilitating Cross-border Transactions and Dispute Resolution. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 40(2). 505.1 indexed citations
Winship, Peter. (1996). As the World Turns: Revisiting Rudolf Schlesinger's Study of the Uniform Commercial Code in the Light of Comparative Law. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 29(3). 1143.
Winship, Peter. (1995). Changing Contract Practices in the Light of the United Nations Sales Convention: A Guide for Practitioners. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 29(3). 525.2 indexed citations
12.
Großfeld, Bernhard & Peter Winship. (1992). The Law Professor Refugee. 18(1). 3.3 indexed citations
13.
Winship, Peter. (1992). The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the International Unification of Private Law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international economic law. 13(2). 227.2 indexed citations
14.
Winship, Peter. (1988). Commentary on Professor Kastely's Rhetorical Analysis Symposium: Reflections on the International Unfication of Sales Law. Northwestern journal of international law & business. 8(3). 623.1 indexed citations
15.
Winship, Peter. (1988). Private International Law and the U.N. Sales Convention. Cornell international law journal. 21(3). 487–534.6 indexed citations
16.
Winship, Peter. (1985). Export-Import Sales under the 1980 United Nations Sales Convention. Hastings international and comparative law review. 8(2). 197.1 indexed citations
17.
Winship, Peter. (1985). AIRCRAFT AND INTERNATIONAL SALES CONVENTIONS. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 50(4). 1053.1 indexed citations
18.
Winship, Peter. (1983). Formation of International Sales Contracts under the 1980 Vienna Convention. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 17(1). 1.1 indexed citations
19.
Winship, Peter. (1977). Jurisprudence and the Uniform Commercial Code: A Commote. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 31(4). 843.1 indexed citations
20.
Winship, Peter. (1973). Industrial property rights in Ethiopia. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 9(2). 357–365.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.