Peter Weber

706 total citations
9 papers, 540 citations indexed

About

Peter Weber is a scholar working on Surgery, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Weber has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 540 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Peter Weber's work include Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). Peter Weber is often cited by papers focused on Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers) and Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers). Peter Weber collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Canada. Peter Weber's co-authors include Bertram Reingruber, Reinhard Sittl, Norbert Grießinger, Stefan Lautenbacher, Claudia Huber, Miriam Kunz, Alexandra Martin, Astrid Mueller, Astrid Müller and Justus P. Beier and has published in prestigious journals such as Pain, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery and Clinical Journal of Pain.

In The Last Decade

Peter Weber

9 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Weber Germany	9	367	129	105	70	62	9	540
Daniela Latzke Austria	7	220 0.6×	32 0.2×	40 0.4×	3 0.0×	14 0.2×	7	368
B. Arnold Germany	14	52 0.1×	349 2.7×	103 1.0×	25 0.4×	31 0.5×	29	503
Marina James Canada	11	75 0.2×	73 0.6×	22 0.2×	8 0.1×	68 1.1×	12	650
Jeong-Yeon Hong South Korea	12	342 0.9×	15 0.1×	26 0.2×	4 0.1×	36 0.6×	24	530
Can Eyigör Türkiye	11	137 0.4×	64 0.5×	28 0.3×	2 0.0×	30 0.5×	36	407
Sheyan J. Armaghani United States	11	676 1.8×	194 1.5×	27 0.3×	3 0.0×	23 0.4×	22	918
T. W. OGG United Kingdom	11	314 0.9×	13 0.1×	30 0.3×	3 0.0×	21 0.3×	28	537
Nolwenn Poquet Australia	4	51 0.1×	176 1.4×	29 0.3×	3 0.0×	54 0.9×	8	329
G. Foxall United Kingdom	7	301 0.8×	14 0.1×	54 0.5×		19 0.3×	10	517
Josue Cardoso United States	13	51 0.1×	345 2.7×	37 0.4×	3 0.0×	141 2.3×	28	505

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Weber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Weber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Weber. The network helps show where Peter Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Weber. Peter Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Dimova, Violeta, Jörn Lötsch, Kathrin Hühne, et al.. (2015). Association of genetic and psychological factors with persistent pain after cosmetic thoracic surgery. Journal of Pain Research. 8. 829–829. 14 indexed citations

2.

Müller, Astrid, et al.. (2012). Self- and social perception of physical appearance in chest wall deformity. Body Image. 9(2). 246–252. 34 indexed citations

3.

Mueller, Astrid, et al.. (2011). Pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum patients suffer from lower quality of life and impaired body image: a control group comparison of psychological characteristics prior to surgical correction. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 40(5). 1138–45. 112 indexed citations

4.

Lautenbacher, Stefan, Claudia Huber, Miriam Kunz, et al.. (2010). Attentional and emotional mechanisms related to pain as predictors of chronic postoperative pain: A comparison with other psychological and physiological predictors. Pain. 151(3). 722–731. 105 indexed citations

5.

Lautenbacher, Stefan, Claudia Huber, Miriam Kunz, et al.. (2009). Hypervigilance as Predictor of Postoperative Acute Pain: Its Predictive Potency Compared With Experimental Pain Sensitivity, Cortisol Reactivity, and Affective State. Clinical Journal of Pain. 25(2). 92–100. 100 indexed citations

6.

Beier, Justus P., Peter Weber, Bertram Reingruber, et al.. (2009). Aesthetic and functional correction of female, asymmetric funnel chest – A combined approach. The Breast. 18(1). 60–65. 16 indexed citations

7.

Reingruber, Bertram, et al.. (2007). Gastroschisis and omphalocele: treatments and long-term outcomes. Pediatric Surgery International. 24(2). 167–173. 88 indexed citations

8.

Weber, Peter, et al.. (2006). Die „neue” Erlanger Trichterbrustkorrektur - Minimalisierung eines bewährten Verfahrens. Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Viszeral- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie. 131(6). 493–498. 9 indexed citations

9.

Weber, Peter, et al.. (2006). Forces to be overcome in correction of pectus excavatum. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 132(6). 1369–1373. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact