Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset
20022.4k citationsNils Petter Gleditsch, Peter Wallensteen et al.Journal of Peace Researchprofile →
Armed conflicts, 1946–2014
2015274 citationsPeter Wallensteen et al.Journal of Peace Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Wallensteen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wallensteen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wallensteen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wallensteen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Wallensteen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wallensteen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wallensteen. The network helps show where Peter Wallensteen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Wallensteen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Wallensteen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Wallensteen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Wallensteen. Peter Wallensteen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wallensteen, Peter. (2015). Understanding Conflict Resolution : War, Peace and the Global System, Fourth Edition. SAGE Publications eBooks.
2.
Wallensteen, Peter. (2014). Global Patterns of Conflict and the Role of Third Parties. The Notre Dame law review. 67(5). 1215.
3.
Themnér, Lotta & Peter Wallensteen. (2014). Armed conflicts, 1946–2013. Journal of Peace Research. 51(4). 541–554.146 indexed citations
4.
Themnér, Lotta & Peter Wallensteen. (2013). Armed Conflicts, 1946–2012. Journal of Peace Research. 50(4). 509–521.116 indexed citations
5.
Wallensteen, Peter. (2011). Peace Research: Theory and Practice. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 117(26). 3812–6.11 indexed citations
6.
Harbom, Lotta & Peter Wallensteen. (2009). Armed Conflicts, 1946—2008. Journal of Peace Research. 46(4). 577–587.76 indexed citations
7.
Wallensteen, Peter, et al.. (2008). Third Parties and Conflict Prevention. 240.5 indexed citations
Eriksson, Mikael & Peter Wallensteen. (2004). Armed Conflict, 1989–2003. Journal of Peace Research. 41(5). 625–636.54 indexed citations
11.
Eriksson, Mikael, Peter Wallensteen, & Margareta Sollenberg. (2003). Armed Conflict, 1989-2002. Journal of Peace Research. 40(5). 593–607.64 indexed citations
12.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Peter Wallensteen, Mikael Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg, & Håvard Strand. (2002). Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset. Journal of Peace Research. 39(5). 615–637.2352 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Seybolt, Taylor B., Peter Wallensteen, & Margareta Sollenberg. (2000). Major Armed Conflicts 2000. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15–49.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.