Peter van Duijvendijk

555 total citations
9 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

Peter van Duijvendijk is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter van Duijvendijk has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Peter van Duijvendijk's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (8 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers). Peter van Duijvendijk is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (8 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (3 papers). Peter van Duijvendijk collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Denmark. Peter van Duijvendijk's co-authors include J. Frederik M. Slors, Hans F. A. Vasen, Paul Oosterveld, Willem A. Bemelman, J. H. C. Kuijpers, Lucio Bertario, W. R. Schouten, Steffen Bülow, José G. Guillem and Pieter J. Tanis and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum and Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Peter van Duijvendijk

9 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter van Duijvendijk Netherlands 7 255 201 169 58 45 9 345
Suraj Alva United States 10 100 0.4× 156 0.8× 43 0.3× 69 1.2× 64 1.4× 14 276
Alan G. Thorson United States 7 241 0.9× 329 1.6× 88 0.5× 61 1.1× 222 4.9× 7 476
John Beynon United Kingdom 10 148 0.6× 106 0.5× 76 0.4× 44 0.8× 20 0.4× 21 263
Campbell Penfold Australia 8 170 0.7× 156 0.8× 32 0.2× 47 0.8× 67 1.5× 9 273
Dursun Buğra Türkiye 11 151 0.6× 164 0.8× 32 0.2× 114 2.0× 16 0.4× 22 308
Abbe J. Janov United States 8 264 1.0× 168 0.8× 87 0.5× 49 0.8× 5 0.1× 8 348
Ahud Sternberg Israel 9 139 0.5× 167 0.8× 55 0.3× 71 1.2× 22 0.5× 23 310
Paul G. Stimson United States 11 176 0.7× 140 0.7× 87 0.5× 56 1.0× 122 2.7× 16 361
A. Laforest France 6 139 0.5× 144 0.7× 56 0.3× 98 1.7× 30 0.7× 13 252
G. Ballardini Italy 9 159 0.6× 79 0.4× 119 0.7× 122 2.1× 40 0.9× 14 275

Countries citing papers authored by Peter van Duijvendijk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter van Duijvendijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter van Duijvendijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter van Duijvendijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter van Duijvendijk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter van Duijvendijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter van Duijvendijk. The network helps show where Peter van Duijvendijk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter van Duijvendijk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter van Duijvendijk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter van Duijvendijk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter van Duijvendijk. Peter van Duijvendijk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Coblijn, Usha K., Boudewijn R. Toorenvliet, Pieter J. Tanis, et al.. (2023). National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study). Techniques in Coloproctology. 27(11). 1083–1090. 5 indexed citations
2.
Bruns, Emma R.J., Stefanus J. van Rooijen, Tanja E. Argillander, et al.. (2018). Improving Outcomes in Oncological Colorectal Surgery by Prehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 98(3). 231–238. 20 indexed citations
3.
Musters, Gijsbert D., Charlotte E.L. Klaver, R.J.I. Bosker, et al.. (2016). Biological Mesh Closure of the Pelvic Floor After Extralevator Abdominoperineal Resection for Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgery. 265(6). 1074–1081. 69 indexed citations
5.
Doeksen, Annemiek, J. A. H. Gooszen, Peter van Duijvendijk, et al.. (2011). Sexual and urinary functioning after rectal surgery: a prospective comparative study with a median follow-up of 8.5 years. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 26(12). 1549–1557. 26 indexed citations
6.
Vrouenraets, Bart C., et al.. (2004). Adenocarcinoma in the Anal Canal After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Using a Double-Stapled Technique: Report of Two Cases. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 47(4). 530–534. 35 indexed citations
7.
Duijvendijk, Peter van, et al.. (2000). What is the benefit of preoperative sperm preservation for patients who undergo restorative proctocolectomy for benign diseases?. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 43(6). 838–842. 4 indexed citations
8.
Duijvendijk, Peter van, Hans F. A. Vasen, Lucio Bertario, et al.. (1999). Cumulative risk of developing polyps or malignancy at the ileal pouch—anal anastomosis in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 3(3). 325–330. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026