Peter Thul

5.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Peter Thul is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biochemistry and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Thul has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Biochemistry and 1 paper in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Peter Thul's work include Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (4 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers). Peter Thul is often cited by papers focused on Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (4 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers) and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (2 papers). Peter Thul collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Austria. Peter Thul's co-authors include Cecilia Lindskog, Mathias Beller, Katharina Thiel, Herbert Jäckle, Michael A. Welte, Zhihuan Li, Ronald P. Kühnlein, Mathias Uhlén, Emma Lundberg and Diana Mahdessian and has published in prestigious journals such as Current Biology, Journal of Cell Science and FEBS Letters.

In The Last Decade

Peter Thul

7 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The human protein atlas: A spatial map of the human proteome

2017 765 citations Peter Thul, Cecilia Lindskog Protein Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Thul Germany	6	925	313	222	210	144	7	1.3k
Dongyu Zhao China	18	762 0.8×	118 0.4×	184 0.8×	120 0.6×	144 1.0×	49	1.1k
Jonas Dehairs Belgium	19	1.2k 1.3×	139 0.4×	756 3.4×	268 1.3×	140 1.0×	53	2.0k
Tenzin Kunchok United States	11	929 1.0×	126 0.4×	412 1.9×	78 0.4×	129 0.9×	14	1.4k
Amin A. Momin United States	13	953 1.0×	72 0.2×	174 0.8×	135 0.6×	161 1.1×	24	1.3k
Young-In Chi United States	18	1.4k 1.5×	293 0.9×	164 0.7×	35 0.2×	161 1.1×	23	2.0k
Boon Tin Chua Singapore	15	827 0.9×	104 0.3×	201 0.9×	58 0.3×	333 2.3×	21	1.2k
Hitoshi Endo Japan	24	1.4k 1.6×	75 0.2×	124 0.6×	92 0.4×	96 0.7×	63	2.0k
Laura Pontano Vaites United States	14	1.4k 1.5×	102 0.3×	229 1.0×	232 1.1×	466 3.2×	17	2.2k
Onno B. Bleijerveld Netherlands	20	849 0.9×	61 0.2×	138 0.6×	103 0.5×	290 2.0×	44	1.3k
Dongmei Zuo Canada	27	1.6k 1.7×	212 0.7×	329 1.5×	96 0.5×	311 2.2×	54	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thul

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thul

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thul. The network helps show where Peter Thul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Thul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Thul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Thul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Thul. Peter Thul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Mahdessian, Diana, Christian Gnann, Anthony J. Cesnik, et al.. (2020). Mapping the nucleolar proteome reveals a spatiotemporal organization related to intrinsic protein disorder. Molecular Systems Biology. 16(8). e9469–e9469. 103 indexed citations

2.

Danielsson, Frida, Diana Mahdessian, Ulrika Axelsson, et al.. (2020). Spatial Characterization of the Human Centrosome Proteome Opens Up New Horizons for a Small but Versatile Organelle. PROTEOMICS. 20(23). e1900361–e1900361. 3 indexed citations

3.

Thul, Peter & Cecilia Lindskog. (2017). The human protein atlas: A spatial map of the human proteome. Protein Science. 27(1). 233–244. 765 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Thul, Peter, et al.. (2017). Targeting of the Drosophila protein CG2254/Ldsdh1 to a subset of lipid droplets. Journal of Cell Science. 130(18). 3141–3157. 18 indexed citations

5.

Thiel, Katharina, Christoph Heier, Peter Thul, et al.. (2013). The evolutionary conserved protein CG9186 is associated with lipid droplets, required for their positioning and for fat storage. Journal of Cell Science. 126(Pt 10). 2198–212. 45 indexed citations

6.

Li, Zhihuan, Katharina Thiel, Peter Thul, et al.. (2012). Lipid Droplets Control the Maternal Histone Supply of Drosophila Embryos. Current Biology. 22(22). 2104–2113. 170 indexed citations

7.

Beller, Mathias, Katharina Thiel, Peter Thul, & Herbert Jäckle. (2010). Lipid droplets: A dynamic organelle moves into focus. FEBS Letters. 584(11). 2176–2182. 218 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact