Peter Thomas

2.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
69 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Peter Thomas is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Thomas has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Ophthalmology, 19 papers in Epidemiology and 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Peter Thomas's work include Bone fractures and treatments (12 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (11 papers). Peter Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Bone fractures and treatments (12 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (11 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (11 papers). Peter Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Peter Thomas's co-authors include Alicia J. El Haj, Dawn A. Sim, Julia L. Magnay, Ji-Peng Olivia Li, M.R. Preston, Swan Kang, Dennis S.C. Lam, Louis R. Pasquale, Youxin Chen and Hanruo Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Peter Thomas

61 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intellig... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Thomas United Kingdom 21 497 473 290 261 180 69 1.5k
Andrew M. Williams United States 18 453 0.9× 238 0.5× 166 0.6× 136 0.5× 240 1.3× 58 1.4k
Peter S. Greene United States 28 279 0.6× 505 1.1× 932 3.2× 677 2.6× 250 1.4× 90 2.8k
Nan Hong China 26 175 0.4× 1.2k 2.6× 145 0.5× 235 0.9× 44 0.2× 126 2.4k
John R. Corboy United States 32 122 0.2× 298 0.6× 226 0.8× 271 1.0× 231 1.3× 110 3.9k
Dun Jack Fu United Kingdom 17 675 1.4× 1.2k 2.5× 94 0.3× 138 0.5× 129 0.7× 41 2.1k
P. Geborek Sweden 33 51 0.1× 398 0.8× 310 1.1× 436 1.7× 118 0.7× 72 4.4k
Lisa B. E. Shields United States 30 89 0.2× 169 0.4× 688 2.4× 289 1.1× 237 1.3× 181 2.7k
Tim B. Hunter United States 22 67 0.1× 320 0.7× 742 2.6× 118 0.5× 143 0.8× 107 1.9k
Wenbin Wei China 18 1.1k 2.1× 695 1.5× 103 0.4× 227 0.9× 74 0.4× 246 2.3k
Richard H. Wiggins United States 26 101 0.2× 376 0.8× 560 1.9× 308 1.2× 49 0.3× 105 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thomas. The network helps show where Peter Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Thomas. Peter Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Jones, Lee, et al.. (2024). User-Centred Design and Development of a Smartphone Application (OverSight) for Digital Phenotyping in Ophthalmology. Healthcare. 12(24). 2550–2550. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wagner, Siegfried K., Mario Cortina‐Borja, Josef Huemer, et al.. (2023). Determinants of non-attendance at face-to-face and telemedicine ophthalmic consultations. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 108(4). bjo–2022. 5 indexed citations
4.
Harris, Tanya, Ingeborg Steinbach, Rachel Stancliffe, et al.. (2021). Improving productivity, costs and environmental impact in International Eye Health Services: using the ‘Eyefficiency’ cataract surgical services auditing tool to assess the value of cataract surgical services. BMJ Open Ophthalmology. 6(1). e000642–e000642. 38 indexed citations
5.
Das, Radha, Marko Lukić, Kelvin Yi Chong Teo, et al.. (2021). Smartphone-based remote monitoring of vision in macular disease enables early detection of worsening pathology and need for intravitreal therapy. BMJ Health & Care Informatics. 28(1). e100310–e100310. 19 indexed citations
6.
Kang, Swan, et al.. (2021). Telemedicine in oculoplastic and adnexal surgery: clinicians’ perspectives in the UK. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 106(10). 1344–1349. 12 indexed citations
7.
Kang, Swan, et al.. (2021). Digital Transformation in Ophthalmic Clinical Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology. 10(4). 381–387. 8 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (2020). ‘The last channel’: vision at the temporal margin of the field. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1927). 20200607–20200607. 2 indexed citations
9.
Thiel, Cassandra L., et al.. (2020). Utilizing off-the-shelf LCA methods to develop a ‘triple bottom line’ auditing tool for global cataract surgical services. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 158. 104805–104805. 17 indexed citations
10.
Li, Ji-Peng Olivia, Hanruo Liu, Darren Shu Jeng Ting, et al.. (2020). Digital technology, tele-medicine and artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A global perspective. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 82. 100900–100900. 358 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
12.
Myerscough, James, et al.. (2019). Sutureless superficial anterior lamellar keratoplasty for recurrent corneal haze after repeat excimer laser surface ablation. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 104(3). 341–344. 5 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (2019). Color vision deficiency among doctors: Can we make useful adaptations to the color codes used in the clinical environment?. Journal of Patient Safety. 17(8). e1646–e1651.
14.
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (2017). Tablets at the bedside - iPad-based visual field test used in the diagnosis of Intrasellar Haemangiopericytoma: a case report. BMC Ophthalmology. 17(1). 53–53. 11 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, Peter. (2017). Bespoke automation of medical workforce rostering using Google’s free cloud applications. Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics. 24(4). 334–334. 3 indexed citations
16.
Singh, Rohit, Ben Rymer, Peter Theobald, & Peter Thomas. (2015). A review of current concepts in flexor tendon repair: physiology, biomechanics, surgical technique and rehabilitation.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(4). 6125–6125. 24 indexed citations
17.
Toms, Andrew D., et al.. (2003). The current management of tibial fractures: are clinical guidelines effective?. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 85(6). 413–416. 17 indexed citations
18.
Roberts, P.J., et al.. (2003). Reliability of radiographs in defining union of internally fixed fractures. Injury. 35(6). 557–561. 84 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (1996). Persistent osteomyelitis of the femur-2 cases of exchange intramedullary nailing with gentamicin beads in the nail. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 67(6). 620–622. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026