Peter Thomas

5.4k total citations
141 papers, 4.5k citations indexed

About

Peter Thomas is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Thomas has authored 141 papers receiving a total of 4.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 65 papers in Molecular Biology, 42 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 32 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Peter Thomas's work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (38 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (37 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (24 papers). Peter Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (38 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (37 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (24 papers). Peter Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Finland. Peter Thomas's co-authors include Carol A. Toth, Norman Zamcheck, Selwyn A. Broitman, Amir Rahemtulla, Amin A. Nanji, Eben S. Fox, J. Milburn Jessup, Glenn Steele, Olga Bajenova and Aniruddha Gangopadhyay and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Thomas

137 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Thomas United States 39 1.7k 1.1k 903 772 584 141 4.5k
Dirk Reinhold Germany 46 1.6k 0.9× 1.9k 1.7× 1.3k 1.4× 340 0.4× 727 1.2× 218 5.8k
Nariyoshi Shinomiya Japan 38 2.0k 1.2× 887 0.8× 931 1.0× 220 0.3× 424 0.7× 194 5.0k
Shingo Tsuji Japan 39 2.4k 1.4× 920 0.8× 1.0k 1.1× 321 0.4× 279 0.5× 154 6.9k
Lutz Graeve Germany 37 2.4k 1.4× 3.1k 2.8× 2.4k 2.6× 317 0.4× 543 0.9× 85 6.5k
Heinfried H. Radeke Germany 43 2.7k 1.6× 576 0.5× 2.0k 2.2× 196 0.3× 482 0.8× 130 6.2k
Clay Winterford Australia 24 2.1k 1.2× 894 0.8× 544 0.6× 127 0.2× 784 1.3× 44 4.3k
Ann C. Williams United Kingdom 40 2.9k 1.7× 1.5k 1.3× 532 0.6× 112 0.1× 417 0.7× 122 6.0k
Airo Tsubura Japan 41 2.5k 1.5× 1.2k 1.0× 374 0.4× 246 0.3× 561 1.0× 315 5.8k
Kikuo Onozaki Japan 35 2.1k 1.2× 613 0.5× 1.8k 2.0× 164 0.2× 713 1.2× 169 5.0k
Courtney W. Houchen United States 48 3.0k 1.7× 2.4k 2.1× 702 0.8× 218 0.3× 291 0.5× 134 5.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Thomas. The network helps show where Peter Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Thomas. Peter Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Judge, Sean J., Peter Thomas, Venkatesh Govindarajan, Poonam Sharma, & Brian W. Loggie. (2015). Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Characterization of the Inflammatory Response in the Tumor Microenvironment. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 23(5). 1496–1500. 13 indexed citations
3.
McVicker, Benita L., et al.. (2014). Alcohol, Carcinoembryonic Antigen Processing and Colorectal Liver Metastases. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 815. 295–311. 7 indexed citations
4.
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (2012). Kras mutations and p53 overexpression in pseudomyxoma peritonei: association with phenotype and prognosis. Journal of Surgical Research. 180(1). 97–103. 41 indexed citations
5.
Thomas, Peter, R. Armour Forse, & Olga Bajenova. (2011). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and its receptor hnRNP M are mediators of metastasis and the inflammatory response in the liver. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 28(8). 923–932. 71 indexed citations
6.
Kruskal, Jonathan B., et al.. (2007). Hepatic Colorectal Cancer Metastases: Imaging Initial Steps of Formation in Mice1. Radiology. 243(3). 703–711. 10 indexed citations
7.
Thomas, Peter, et al.. (2005). Binding characteristics, hormonal regulation and identity of the sperm membrane progestin receptor in Atlantic croaker. Steroids. 70(5-7). 427–433. 52 indexed citations
9.
Lise, Mario, et al.. (2000). Clinical Correlations of α2,6-Sialyltransferase Expression in Colorectal Cancer Patients. PubMed. 19(4). 281–286. 63 indexed citations
10.
Gangopadhyay, Aniruddha, et al.. (1998). Differential Expression of α2,6-Sialyltransferase in Colon Tumors Recognized by a Monoclonal Antibody. Hybridoma. 17(2). 117–123. 17 indexed citations
11.
Su, Grace L., Amir Rahemtulla, Peter Thomas, et al.. (1998). CD14 and lipopolysaccharide binding protein expression in a rat model of alcoholic liver disease.. PubMed. 152(3). 841–9. 73 indexed citations
12.
Gangopadhyay, Aniruddha, et al.. (1998). Adhesion of colorectal carcinoma cells to the endothelium is mediated by cytokines from CEA stimulated Kupffer cells. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 16(8). 703–712. 94 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Peter. (1997). Image-guided pain management. 6 indexed citations
14.
Jessup, J. Milburn, Peter Thomas, Shoken Ishii, et al.. (1993). Adhesion to carcinoembryonic antigen by human colorectal carcinoma cells involves at least two epitopes. International Journal of Cancer. 55(2). 262–268. 33 indexed citations
15.
Ishii, Shoken, et al.. (1993). CD44 participates in the adhesion of human colorectal carcinoma cells to laminin and type IV collagen. Surgical Oncology. 2(4). 255–264. 70 indexed citations
16.
Wagner, Hans E., Carol A. Toth, Glenn Steele, & Peter Thomas. (1992). Metastatic potential of human colon cancer cell lines: relationship to cellular differentiation and carcinoembryonic antigen production. Clinical & Experimental Metastasis. 10(1). 25–31. 74 indexed citations
17.
Toth, Carol A. & Peter Thomas. (1990). The Effect of Interferon Treatment on 14 Human Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines: Growth and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Secretion In Vitro. Journal of Interferon Research. 10(6). 579–588. 17 indexed citations
18.
Fox, Eben S., Peter Thomas, & Selwyn A. Broitman. (1990). Hepatic mechanisms for clearance and detoxification of bacterial endotoxins. The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry. 1(12). 620–628. 44 indexed citations
19.
Toth, Carol A., Glenn Steele, & Peter Thomas. (1990). A carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) binding protein from ascites influences CEA uptake by macrophages. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 171(2). 633–640. 3 indexed citations
20.
Fox, Eben S., Peter Thomas, & Selwyn A. Broitman. (1989). Clearance of Gut-Derived Endotoxins by the Liver. Gastroenterology. 96(2). 456–461. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026