Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Australopithecus sediba : A New Species of Homo -Like Australopith from South Africa
2010364 citationsLee R. Berger, Steven E. Churchill et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schmid more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schmid. The network helps show where Peter Schmid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Schmid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Schmid.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Schmid based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Schmid. Peter Schmid is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Williams, Scott A., Thomas C. Prang, Marc R. Meyer, et al.. (2021). New fossils of Australopithecus sediba reveal a nearly complete lower back. Library Open Repository (Universidad Complutense Madrid).4 indexed citations
3.
Schmid, Peter, et al.. (2018). Individual, Systematic and Systemic Risks in the Danish Banking Sector. RUCforsk (Roskilde University). 68(4). 320–350.1 indexed citations
Bastir, Markus, Daniel García‐Martínez, Scott A. Williams, et al.. (2017). Geometric morphometrics of hominoid thoraces and its bearing for reconstructing the ribcage of H. naledi.1 indexed citations
Williams, Scott A., Daniel García‐Martínez, Marc R. Meyer, et al.. (2016). The axial skeleton and scaling of the trunk in Homo naledi.1 indexed citations
Williams, Scott A., et al.. (2013). The number of vertebrae in early hominins: insights from Australopithecus sediba.1 indexed citations
10.
Schmid, Peter, et al.. (2011). DINÁMICA DE LA VEGETACIÓN DE LOS HUMEDALES DEL PARQUE NACIONAL LAGUNA BLANCA (NEUQUÉN, ARGENTINA). PROPUESTA DE UN MODELO DE ESTADOS Y TRANSICIONES. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 20(20). 43–62.1 indexed citations
Hall, Grant, et al.. (2006). An Acheulean handaxe from Gladysvale Cave site, Gauteng, South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 102. 103–105.10 indexed citations
Schmid, Peter, et al.. (2002). Prácticas de rehabilitación de aridisoles y entisoles del norte de la patagonia afectados por la apertura de líneas sísmicas. Ciencia del suelo. 20(2). 88–97.3 indexed citations
Schmid, Peter, et al.. (1981). [Herlitz, severe generalized atrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Description and genealogic clarification of 4 new cases from Unterwalden canton].. PubMed. 111(17). 603–12.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.