Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schlechtriem
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schlechtriem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schlechtriem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schlechtriem more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schlechtriem
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schlechtriem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schlechtriem. The network helps show where Peter Schlechtriem may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Schlechtriem
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Schlechtriem.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Schlechtriem based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Schlechtriem. Peter Schlechtriem is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bar, Christian v., Eric Clive, Hans Schulte–Nölke, et al.. (2008). Principles, definitions and model rules of European private law: draft common frame of reference (DCFR). - Interim outline ed.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).4 indexed citations
Schlechtriem, Peter. (2002). Wandlungen des Schuldrechts. Nomos eBooks.1 indexed citations
7.
Schlechtriem, Peter. (2000). Restitution und Bereicherungsausgleich in Europa : eine rechtsvergleichende Darstellung. Mohr Siebeck eBooks.1 indexed citations
8.
Schlechtriem, Peter. (1999). Termination and Adjustment of Contracts. European Journal of Law Reform. 1(3). 305–323.1 indexed citations
9.
Schlechtriem, Peter, et al.. (1998). Recht im Spannungsfeld von Theorie und Praxis : Festschrift für Helmut Heinrichs zum 70. Geburtstag. C.H.Beck eBooks.1 indexed citations
10.
Schlechtriem, Peter. (1998). Commentary on the UN convention of the international sale of goods : (CISG). Beck eBooks.7 indexed citations
11.
Schlechtriem, Peter, et al.. (1991). Restitution of benefits conferred without obligation.2 indexed citations
12.
Friedmann, Daniel, et al.. (1991). Adjustment among multiple debtors.1 indexed citations
13.
Schlechtriem, Peter, et al.. (1990). Kommentar zum Einheitlichen UN-Kaufrecht : das Übereinkommen der Vereinten Nationen über Verträge über den internationalen Warenkauf : CISG-Kommentar. C.H.Beck eBooks.
14.
Schlechtriem, Peter, et al.. (1989). History of restitution in Anglo-American law. J.C.B. Mohr eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Schlechtriem, Peter. (1988). The Borderland of Tort and Contract—Opening a New Frontier. Cornell international law journal. 21(3). 467–476.5 indexed citations
16.
Schlechtriem, Peter, et al.. (1987). Internationale Rechtsprechung zu EKG und EAG : eine Sammlung belgischer, deutscher, italienischer, israelischer und niederländischer Entscheidungen zu den Haager Einheitlichen Kaufgesetzen. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks.
17.
Schlechtriem, Peter, et al.. (1987). Einheitliches Kaufrecht und nationales Obligationenrecht.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.