Countries citing papers authored by Peter S. Hersh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter S. Hersh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter S. Hersh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter S. Hersh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter S. Hersh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter S. Hersh. The network helps show where Peter S. Hersh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter S. Hersh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter S. Hersh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter S. Hersh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter S. Hersh. Peter S. Hersh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Greenstein, Steven A., et al.. (2019). Clinical Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations after Combination Intracorneal Ring Segments and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 60(9). 2220–2220.1 indexed citations
6.
Issa, Reda, Peter S. Hersh, & Steven A. Greenstein. (2016). Corneal Collagen Crosslinking and Intracorneal Ring Segments: Simultaneous vs Sequential Surgery. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 2885–2885.1 indexed citations
7.
Greenstein, Steven A. & Peter S. Hersh. (2014). Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Intracorneal Ring Segment placement with Adjunctive Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 4227–4227.1 indexed citations
8.
Friedman, Marc D., et al.. (2013). Use of Zonal Km vs Point Kmax for Analysis of Corneal Cross-linking Pentacam Topography. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 5276–5276.2 indexed citations
Hersh, Peter S. & K. L. Fry. (2009). Corneal Thickness Changes During Corneal Collagen Crosslinking. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 5490–5490.2 indexed citations
15.
Fry, K. L., et al.. (2008). Normal Values and Variability of Central Corneal Thickness and Biomechanical Parameters. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 644–644.5 indexed citations
16.
Fry, K. L., David A. Luce, & Peter S. Hersh. (2008). Integrated Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Score as a Biomechanical Index of Keratoconus Disease Severity. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 4343–4343.3 indexed citations
17.
Fry, K. L. & Peter S. Hersh. (2007). The Influence of Corneal Biomechanics on Conductive Keratoplasty Outcomes. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 5361–5361.1 indexed citations
18.
Fry, K. L., et al.. (2007). Ora Measurements After PRK and LASIK. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 48(13). 5331–5331.
19.
Fry, K. L., et al.. (2005). Comparison of Visual Outcomes of Wavefront Guided and Conventional LASIK. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 4375–4375.1 indexed citations
20.
Fry, K. L., et al.. (2003). Spherical Aberration After LASIK and PRK: A Clinical and Theoretical Analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 2618–2618.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.