Peter Rappoport
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 2%
- Finance top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Accounting
- Co-authors
- Lucrezia ReichlinRobert D. CooterEugene N. WhiteDermot GatelyRoman FrydmanNachum SichermanAllan T. Bombard
- Topics
- Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers)Economic theories and models (3 papers)Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Peter Rappoport
11 papers receiving 421 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Economics and Econometrics 379
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 252
- Finance 116
- Sociology and Political Science 67
- Accounting 40
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rappoport
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rappoport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rappoport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rappoport more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rappoport
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rappoport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rappoport. The network helps show where Peter Rappoport may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Rappoport
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Rappoport. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Rappoport based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Rappoport. Peter Rappoport is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | Was the crash of 1929 expected | 95 |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 205 | |
| 7 | Reply to Professor Hennipman: Communications | 2 |
| 8 | Reply to Professor Hennipman | 4 |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | Is the Distinction between Anticipated and Unanticipated Money Growth Relevant in Explaining Aggregate Output | 20 |
| 11 | Reply to I. M. D. Little's Comment [Were the Ordinalists Wrong about Welfare Economics?] | 4 |
| 12 | Were the Ordinalists Wrong About Welfare Economics | 122 |
| 13 | Rational expectations and rationality | 1 |
About Peter Rappoport
Peter Rappoport is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 13 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers), Economic theories and models (3 papers) and Economic Theory and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (252 citations), Economics and Econometrics (379 citations) and Finance (116 citations). Peter Rappoport has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Lucrezia Reichlin, Robert D. Cooter, Eugene N. White, Dermot Gately, Roman Frydman, Nachum Sicherman and Allan T. Bombard. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, The Economic Journal and Journal of Economic Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.