Peter Pfeifer

2.1k total citations
41 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Peter Pfeifer is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Pfeifer has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Materials Chemistry, 10 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Peter Pfeifer's work include Hydrogen Storage and Materials (18 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (9 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers). Peter Pfeifer is often cited by papers focused on Hydrogen Storage and Materials (18 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (9 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (6 papers). Peter Pfeifer collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Lebanon. Peter Pfeifer's co-authors include Milton W. Cole, You Wu, J. Krim, Bogdan Kuchta, Boris Zeide, Carlos Wexler, Lucyna Firlej, Martin Obert, Jimmy Romanos and L. Firlej and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and Advanced Materials.

In The Last Decade

Peter Pfeifer

40 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Pfeifer United States 21 583 256 248 240 223 41 1.5k
Hiroshi Mori Japan 29 714 1.2× 227 0.9× 175 0.7× 205 0.9× 266 1.2× 173 2.7k
Jeremy Walton United Kingdom 17 828 1.4× 345 1.3× 176 0.7× 927 3.9× 273 1.2× 41 2.4k
S. Speziale Germany 31 979 1.7× 165 0.6× 162 0.7× 94 0.4× 139 0.6× 119 3.4k
John G. Stevens United States 23 451 0.8× 144 0.6× 70 0.3× 231 1.0× 171 0.8× 94 1.8k
Kirk H. Michaelian Canada 28 589 1.0× 843 3.3× 321 1.3× 470 2.0× 121 0.5× 147 2.6k
Markus Bleuel United States 24 402 0.7× 265 1.0× 309 1.2× 264 1.1× 154 0.7× 85 1.5k
K.W. Jones United States 23 247 0.4× 222 0.9× 291 1.2× 177 0.7× 184 0.8× 98 1.6k
I. G. Wood United Kingdom 28 973 1.7× 259 1.0× 160 0.6× 186 0.8× 251 1.1× 105 2.5k
Toru Takeshita Japan 32 678 1.2× 249 1.0× 283 1.1× 72 0.3× 182 0.8× 98 2.6k
Themis Matsoukas United States 26 1.1k 1.8× 535 2.1× 263 1.1× 328 1.4× 154 0.7× 76 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Pfeifer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Pfeifer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Pfeifer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Pfeifer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Pfeifer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Pfeifer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Pfeifer. The network helps show where Peter Pfeifer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Pfeifer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Pfeifer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Pfeifer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Pfeifer. Peter Pfeifer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Newport, Kyle, Carlos Wexler, Peter Pfeifer, & Fateme Rezaei. (2024). Analysis of Dual, Onboard Storage and Separation of Biogas in Carbon-Based Adsorbed Gas Systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 63(46). 20304–20314.
2.
Stalla, David, et al.. (2020). Determination of the enthalpy of adsorption of hydrogen in activated carbon at room temperature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 45(31). 15541–15552. 17 indexed citations
3.
Romanos, Jimmy, Matthew Beckner, Tyler Rash, et al.. (2019). Boron-neutron Capture on Activated Carbon for Hydrogen Storage. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 2971–2971. 30 indexed citations
4.
Romanos, Jimmy, et al.. (2018). Local Pressure of Supercritical Adsorbed Hydrogen in Nanopores. Materials. 11(11). 2235–2235. 9 indexed citations
5.
Romanos, Jimmy, et al.. (2018). Structure–Function Relations for Gravimetric and Volumetric Methane Storage Capacities in Activated Carbon. ACS Omega. 3(11). 15119–15124. 14 indexed citations
6.
Romanos, Jimmy, et al.. (2018). Properties of adsorbed supercritical methane film in nanopores. AIP Advances. 8(12). 9 indexed citations
7.
Contescu, Cristian I., et al.. (2017). Phase Transition of H2in Subnanometer Pores Observed at 75 K. ACS Nano. 11(11). 11617–11631. 8 indexed citations
8.
Roszak, Rafał, L. Firlej, Szczepan Roszak, Peter Pfeifer, & Bogdan Kuchta. (2015). Hydrogen storage by adsorption in porous materials: Is it possible?. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 496. 69–76. 31 indexed citations
9.
Kuchta, Bogdan, et al.. (2012). Open carbon frameworks - a search for optimal geometry for hydrogen storage. Journal of Molecular Modeling. 19(10). 4079–4087. 13 indexed citations
10.
Hou, Chen, Stefan Gheorghiu, Virginia H. Huxley, & Peter Pfeifer. (2010). Reverse Engineering of Oxygen Transport in the Lung: Adaptation to Changing Demands and Resources through Space-Filling Networks. PLoS Computational Biology. 6(8). e1000902–e1000902. 24 indexed citations
11.
Firlej, Lucyna, et al.. (2010). Sub-nanometer characterization of activated carbon by inelastic neutron scattering. Carbon. 49(5). 1663–1671. 8 indexed citations
12.
Kuchta, Bogdan, Lucyna Firlej, Szczepan Roszak, & Peter Pfeifer. (2010). A review of boron enhanced nanoporous carbons for hydrogen adsorption: numerical perspective. Adsorption. 16(4-5). 413–421. 33 indexed citations
13.
Firlej, Lucyna, et al.. (2009). Enhanced hydrogen adsorption in boron substituted carbon nanospaces. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 131(16). 164702–164702. 47 indexed citations
14.
Pfeifer, Peter, Françoise Ehrburger‐Dolle, T. P. Rieker, et al.. (2002). Nearly Space-Filling Fractal Networks of Carbon Nanopores. Physical Review Letters. 88(11). 115502–115502. 66 indexed citations
15.
Gheorghiu, Stefan & Peter Pfeifer. (2000). Nonstandard Roughness of Terraced Surfaces. Physical Review Letters. 85(18). 3894–3897. 6 indexed citations
16.
Winter, Roland, et al.. (1999). Power-law fluctuations in phase-separated lipid membranes. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 60(6). 7354–7359. 27 indexed citations
17.
Pfeifer, Peter, et al.. (1998). A comparative study of spectral and angle-dependent SPR devices in biological applications. Sensors and Actuators B Chemical. 51(1-3). 298–304. 11 indexed citations
18.
Zeide, Boris & Peter Pfeifer. (1991). A Method for Estimation of Fractal Dimension of Tree Crowns. Forest Science. 37(5). 1253–1265. 110 indexed citations
19.
Pfeifer, Peter, Martin Obert, & Milton W. Cole. (1989). Fractal bet and FHH theories of adsorption: a comparative study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 423(1864). 169–188. 105 indexed citations
20.
Pfeifer, Peter & Margaret Barnes. (1969). Brain and cerebellum fatty acid pattern changes in the encephalomalacic chick and the presence of a homeostatic mechanism. Biochemical Journal. 114(4). 68P–69P. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026