Peter M. Pinsky

99 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Peter M. Pinsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Mechanics of Materials 1.1k
  • Ophthalmology 335
  • Computational Mechanics 656
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 711
  • Biomedical Engineering 820
Replace Anna Pandolfi with:
Anna Pandolfi Italy
Michel Destrade Ireland
Francis Duck United Kingdom
Kunal Mitra United States
S. Sivaloganathan Canada
Risto Myllylä Finland
Jeffrey J. Heys United States
Christian J. Cyron Germany
D.C.C. Lam Hong Kong
Mark H. Holmes United States
Peter M. Pinsky relative to Anna Pandolfi Italy Anna Pandolfi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anna Pandolfi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Pinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Pinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Pinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Pinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Pinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Pinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Pinsky. The network helps show where Peter M. Pinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Pinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter M. Pinsky Line = papers co-authored together Peter M. Pinsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004325
2 1995210
3 2005170
4 1991120
5 2011114
6 1983112
7 2013109
8 1994104
9 198399
10 199684
11 198782
12 198371
13 201368
14 199868
15 200061
16 199253
17 200547
18 200344
19 201537
20 200837

About Peter M. Pinsky

Peter M. Pinsky is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 99 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (27 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (25 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (19 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (16 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (13 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (13 papers), Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization (12 papers) and Elasticity and Material Modeling (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (1.1k citations), Ophthalmology (335 citations), Computational Mechanics (656 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (711 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (820 citations). Peter M. Pinsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Lonny L. Thompson, Silvia S. Blemker, Scott L. Delp, Assad A. Oberai, Miguel Ortiz, Steven J. Petsche, Dimitri Chernyak, Najib N. Abboud, Robert L. Taylor and Xi Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Biomechanics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact