Peter L. Guth

3.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Peter L. Guth is a scholar working on Environmental Engineering, Atmospheric Science and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter L. Guth has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Environmental Engineering, 15 papers in Atmospheric Science and 11 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Peter L. Guth's work include Landslides and related hazards (11 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (9 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (8 papers). Peter L. Guth is often cited by papers focused on Landslides and related hazards (11 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (9 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (8 papers). Peter L. Guth collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Brazil. Peter L. Guth's co-authors include Sebastian Sobek, Robert G. Striegl, Philippe Ciais, Pirkko Kortelainen, Emilio Mayorga, David Butman, Jens Hartmann, Mark D. Hoover, Christoph Humborg and Hans H. Dürr and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

In The Last Decade

Peter L. Guth

35 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter L. Guth United States 12 1.2k 858 655 650 516 45 2.5k
Hilary A. Dugan United States 27 511 0.4× 337 0.4× 644 1.0× 685 1.1× 526 1.0× 79 2.2k
Marie‐Paule Bonnet France 35 790 0.7× 1.8k 2.1× 452 0.7× 799 1.2× 1.6k 3.1× 100 3.5k
Damien Bouffard Switzerland 29 1.4k 1.2× 518 0.6× 884 1.3× 648 1.0× 492 1.0× 113 2.6k
Alon Rimmer Israel 25 383 0.3× 545 0.6× 439 0.7× 259 0.4× 667 1.3× 58 1.7k
Jr‐Chuan Huang Taiwan 30 335 0.3× 660 0.8× 440 0.7× 340 0.5× 614 1.2× 107 2.4k
Jonathan A. Warrick United States 36 686 0.6× 602 0.7× 155 0.2× 1.7k 2.6× 512 1.0× 119 3.2k
K.R. Dyer United Kingdom 35 2.0k 1.7× 735 0.9× 414 0.6× 3.3k 5.0× 380 0.7× 78 5.7k
Naishuang Bi China 31 856 0.7× 572 0.7× 379 0.6× 1.9k 2.9× 549 1.1× 85 3.4k
Charles Verpoorter France 15 978 0.8× 851 1.0× 567 0.9× 694 1.1× 616 1.2× 20 2.3k
David H. Schoellhamer United States 35 975 0.8× 679 0.8× 198 0.3× 2.0k 3.1× 492 1.0× 122 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter L. Guth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter L. Guth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter L. Guth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter L. Guth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter L. Guth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter L. Guth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter L. Guth. The network helps show where Peter L. Guth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter L. Guth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter L. Guth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter L. Guth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter L. Guth. Peter L. Guth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Guth, Peter L., Sebastiano Trevisani, Carlos Henrique Grohmann, John B. Lindsay, & H.I. Reuter. (2025). Benchmarking Elevation Plus Land Surface Parameters Finds FathomDEM and Copernicus DEM Win as Best Global DEMs. Remote Sensing. 17(23). 3919–3919.
2.
Trevisani, Sebastiano & Peter L. Guth. (2025). Surface Roughness in Geomorphometry: From Basic Metrics Toward a Coherent Framework. Remote Sensing. 17(23). 3864–3864.
3.
Riazanoff, Serge, C. Albinet, Peter Strobl, et al.. (2024). Best BiCubic Method to Compute the Planimetric Misregistration between Images with Sub-Pixel Accuracy: Application to Digital Elevation Models. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 13(3). 96–96. 1 indexed citations
4.
Guth, Peter L., Sebastiano Trevisani, Carlos Henrique Grohmann, et al.. (2024). Ranking of 10 Global One-Arc-Second DEMs Reveals Limitations in Terrain Morphology Representation. Remote Sensing. 16(17). 3273–3273. 10 indexed citations
5.
Trevisani, Sebastiano & Peter L. Guth. (2024). Terrain Analysis According to Multiscale Surface Roughness in the Taklimakan Desert. Land. 13(11). 1843–1843. 3 indexed citations
6.
Trevisani, Sebastiano, Giordano Teza, & Peter L. Guth. (2023). A simplified geostatistical approach for characterizing key aspects of short-range roughness. CATENA. 223. 106927–106927. 9 indexed citations
7.
Trevisani, Sebastiano, Giordano Teza, & Peter L. Guth. (2023). Hacking the topographic ruggedness index. Geomorphology. 439. 108838–108838. 14 indexed citations
8.
Guth, Peter L., et al.. (2022). The Oktober Flut: An anomalous extreme high-water event in Annapolis, MD, USA, October 2021. 27–38. 1 indexed citations
9.
Guth, Peter L., Adriaan van Niekerk, Carlos Henrique Grohmann, et al.. (2021). Digital Elevation Models: Terminology and Definitions. Remote Sensing. 13(18). 3581–3581. 116 indexed citations
10.
Guth, Peter L., et al.. (2021). Slope, aspect, and hillshade algorithms for non‐square digital elevation models. Transactions in GIS. 25(5). 2309–2332. 12 indexed citations
11.
Guth, Peter L., et al.. (2021). LiDAR point cloud and ICESat‐2 evaluation of 1 second global digital elevation models: Copernicus wins. Transactions in GIS. 25(5). 2245–2261. 94 indexed citations
12.
Alvioli, Massimiliano, Ivan Marchesini, Laura Melelli, & Peter L. Guth. (2020). Geomorphometry 2020. Conference Proceedings. CNR SOLAR (Scientific Open-access Literature Archive and Repository) (University of Southampton). 5 indexed citations
13.
Raymond, Peter A., Jens Hartmann, Ronny Lauerwald, et al.. (2013). Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature. 503(7476). 355–359. 1828 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Guth, Peter L.. (2011). Drainage basin morphometry: a global snapshot from the shuttle radar topography mission. Hydrology and earth system sciences. 15(7). 2091–2099. 28 indexed citations
16.
Thibaud, Rémy, et al.. (2005). Target3D: interactive visualization over the world wide web. 101. 30–39.
17.
Thibaud, Rémy, et al.. (2002). Target3D: Interactive Visulaization over the World Wide Web. 30–39. 1 indexed citations
18.
Guth, Peter L.. (1987). MicroNet: interactive equal-area and equal-angle nets. Computers & Geosciences. 13(5). 541–543. 7 indexed citations
19.
Wernicke, Brian P., J.E. Spencer, & Peter L. Guth. (1983). Comment and Reply on ‘Magnitude of crustal extension in the southern Great Basin’. Geology. 11(8). 496–496. 1 indexed citations
20.
Guth, Peter L., et al.. (1982). Limitations on the role of pore pressure in gravity gliding. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 93(7). 606–606. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026