Peter Kerkhof

3.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
57 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Peter Kerkhof is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Kerkhof has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 17 papers in Communication and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Kerkhof's work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (17 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (14 papers) and Social Media and Politics (12 papers). Peter Kerkhof is often cited by papers focused on Impact of Technology on Adolescents (17 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (14 papers) and Social Media and Politics (12 papers). Peter Kerkhof collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Australia. Peter Kerkhof's co-authors include Camiel J. Beukeboom, Catrin Finkenauer, Corné Dijkmans, Enny Das, L.D. Muusses, Guido M. van Koningsbruggen, Jie Du, Sonja Utz, Guda van Noort and Sander Hermsen and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Tourism Management and Computers in Human Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Peter Kerkhof

53 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

A stage to engage: Social media use and corporate reputation 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Kerkhof Netherlands 25 1.7k 494 438 414 351 57 2.5k
Meredith E. David United States 23 1.6k 0.9× 459 0.9× 503 1.1× 273 0.7× 294 0.8× 47 2.5k
Prabu David United States 25 1.2k 0.7× 335 0.7× 305 0.7× 316 0.8× 231 0.7× 58 2.5k
Marjolijn L. Antheunis Netherlands 25 1.3k 0.8× 253 0.5× 465 1.1× 230 0.6× 200 0.6× 67 2.3k
Chun‐Tuan Chang Taiwan 25 1.5k 0.9× 1.2k 2.4× 440 1.0× 297 0.7× 156 0.4× 63 2.7k
Jung-Hyun Kim United States 19 2.1k 1.2× 239 0.5× 376 0.9× 289 0.7× 449 1.3× 59 2.8k
Cynthia Cryder United States 17 1.2k 0.7× 735 1.5× 665 1.5× 201 0.5× 322 0.9× 29 3.1k
Shupei Yuan United States 22 2.5k 1.4× 881 1.8× 205 0.5× 660 1.6× 105 0.3× 48 3.4k
Se‐Hoon Jeong South Korea 20 1.6k 0.9× 383 0.8× 190 0.4× 319 0.8× 153 0.4× 73 2.4k
Hee Sun Park United States 26 1.1k 0.6× 241 0.5× 1.3k 3.0× 110 0.3× 439 1.3× 91 2.5k
Leonard N. Reid United States 33 1.2k 0.7× 1.6k 3.3× 212 0.5× 237 0.6× 154 0.4× 129 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kerkhof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kerkhof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kerkhof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kerkhof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kerkhof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kerkhof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kerkhof. The network helps show where Peter Kerkhof may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Kerkhof

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Kerkhof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Kerkhof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Kerkhof. Peter Kerkhof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tanis, Martin, et al.. (2025). YouTube and Religion during COVID-19: Analyzing Indonesian Islamic Groups’ Narratives. Journal of Religion and Health.
2.
Ramondt, Steven, Peter Kerkhof, & Eva‐Maria Merz. (2025). Boosting Blood Donations Through Facebook Engagement: Randomized Controlled Field Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27. e64740–e64740.
3.
Willemsen, Lotte M., et al.. (2024). Exploring the dimensionality of Fear of Missing Out: Associations with related constructs. Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace. 18(1). 3 indexed citations
4.
Kerkhof, Peter, et al.. (2024). Content analysis of patient support groups related to myositis on Facebook. Clinical Rheumatology. 43(2). 725–732. 3 indexed citations
5.
6.
Vermeulen, Ivar, et al.. (2021). Continued influence of misinformation in times of COVID‐19. International Journal of Psychology. 57(1). 136–145. 16 indexed citations
7.
Kerkhof, Peter, et al.. (2020). More facebook, less homesick? Investigating the short-term and long-term reciprocal relations of interactions, homesickness, and adjustment among international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 75. 118–131. 19 indexed citations
8.
Nerghes, Adina, Peter Kerkhof, & Iina Hellsten. (2018). Early Public Responses to the Zika-Virus on YouTube. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 127–134. 13 indexed citations
9.
Hermsen, Sander, et al.. (2017). Determinants for Sustained Use of an Activity Tracker: Observational Study. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 5(10). e164–e164. 105 indexed citations
10.
Kerkhof, Peter, et al.. (2016). PowerPoint Slides as Speaking Notes. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 79(3). 348–359. 2 indexed citations
11.
Ketelaar, P.E., et al.. (2015). The Good, the Bad, and the Expert: How Consumer Expertise Affects Review Valence Effects on Purchase Intentions in Online Product Reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 20(6). 649–666. 48 indexed citations
12.
Muusses, L.D., et al.. (2014). A longitudinal study of the association between Compulsive Internet use and wellbeing. Computers in Human Behavior. 36. 21–28. 82 indexed citations
13.
Kerkhof, Peter, et al.. (2014). A stage to engage: social media use, social media engagement and corporate reputation. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 1 indexed citations
14.
Kerkhof, Peter, et al.. (2011). Crisis PR in Social Media: An Experimental Study of the Effects of Organizational Crisis Responses on Facebook. 77(2). 99–101. 13 indexed citations
15.
Finkenauer, Catrin, et al.. (2009). Secrecy in close relationships: Investigating its intrapersonal and interpersonal effects. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 300–319. 9 indexed citations
16.
Das, Enny, et al.. (2008). Improving the Effectiveness of Fundraising Messages: The Impact of Charity Goal Attainment, Message Framing, and Evidence on Persuasion. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 36(2). 161–175. 118 indexed citations
17.
Noort, Guda van, Peter Kerkhof, & Bob M. Fennis. (2007). Online versus Conventional Shopping: Consumers' Risk Perception and Regulatory Focus. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10(5). 731–733. 48 indexed citations
18.
Finkenauer, Catrin, Tom Frijns, Rutger C. M. E. Engels, & Peter Kerkhof. (2005). Perceiving concealment in relationships between parents and adolescents: Links with parental behavior. Personal Relationships. 12(3). 387–406. 55 indexed citations
19.
Noort, Guda van, Peter Kerkhof, & Bob M. Fennis. (2005). Online winkelen en regulatieve focus. University of Twente Research Information. 297–304. 2 indexed citations
20.
Kerkhof, Peter, et al.. (2003). Instrumental and relational determinants of trust in management among members of works councils. Personnel Review. 32(5). 623–637. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026