Peter Janssen
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 44
- Neural dynamics and brain function 41
- Motor Control and Adaptation 18
- Face Recognition and Perception 15
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 14
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 10
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 9
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 9
- Neurology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
Peter Janssen
87 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.6k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 476
- Neurology 208
- Social Psychology 462
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 265
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Janssen
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Janssen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Janssen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Janssen. The network helps show where Peter Janssen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Janssen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 17 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 35 | |
| 16 | The role of inferior temporal area TEs and posterior parietal area AIP in perceptual decisions about disparity-defined 3D shapes: a choice probability and inactivation study | 2009 | 2 |
| 17 | Selectivity for disparity-defined three-dimensionsal shape in macaque premotor cortex | 2009 | 1 |
| 18 | Coding for first- and second order disparity in macaque posterior parietal cortex | 2007 | 3 |
| 19 | Higher order disparity sensitive regions in human cortex? an fMRI study | 2002 | 3 |
| 20 | Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for small differences in 3D structure | 1999 | 2 |
About Peter Janssen
Peter Janssen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 90 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (44 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (41 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (18 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (15 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (14 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (10 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.6k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (476 citations) and Neurology (208 citations). Peter Janssen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rufin Vogels, Guy A. Orban, Michael N. Shadlen, Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Maria C. Romero, Elsie Premereur, Wim Vanduffel, Tom Theys, Pierpaolo Pani and J. van Loon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, NeuroImage, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.