Peter J. Bore

2.8k citations
34 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 23

Peter J. Bore

33 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Peter J. Bore
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 367
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 935
  • Clinical Biochemistry 237
  • Cell Biology 336
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 168
Replace M. Joan Dawson with:
M. Joan Dawson United States
J. S. Leigh United States
Scott M. Eleff United States
D.J. Taylor United Kingdom
Thomas Jue United States
Jeanine J. Prompers Netherlands
Martin Meyerspeer Austria
R. S. Balaban United States
William Bank United States
Juli Alonso Spain
Peter J. Bore relative to M. Joan Dawson United States M. Joan Dawson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Joan Dawson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Bore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Bore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Bore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Bore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Bore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Bore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Bore. The network helps show where Peter J. Bore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Bore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Bore Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Bore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Analysis of rat heart in vivo by phosphorus nuclear
20160
2 199222
3 199124
4 19898
5 198842
6 198722
7 198729
8 19867
9 19862
10 19852
11 198458
12 19831
13 19824
14 1982128
15 198161
16 198030
17 198087
18 198034
19
Non-destructive measurement of metabolites and tissue pH in the kidney by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance.
197929
20 197757

About Peter J. Bore

Peter J. Bore is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Chemical Health and Safety, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Nephrology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (11 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (9 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (8 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (6 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (3 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (367 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (935 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (237 citations), Cell Biology (336 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (168 citations). Peter J. Bore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Styles, D.J. Taylor, G. K. Radda, David G. Gadian, G. K. Radda, DG Gadian, Douglas L. Arnold, George K. Radda, Graham J. Galloway and Laurence Chan. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nature, British Journal of Radiology and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026