Peter H. Singleton

1.7k total citations
25 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Peter H. Singleton is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter H. Singleton has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Ecology, 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Peter H. Singleton's work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers). Peter H. Singleton is often cited by papers focused on Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (11 papers). Peter H. Singleton collaborates with scholars based in United States. Peter H. Singleton's co-authors include William L. Gaines, John F. Lehmkuhl, Thomas A. Spies, D. John Pierce, Brad H. McRae, Maureen C. Kennedy, Meade Krosby, E. David Ford, Paul F. Hessburg and R. Brion Salter and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Journal of Applied Ecology and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Peter H. Singleton

25 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter H. Singleton United States 13 734 694 382 196 107 25 1.1k
James R. Strittholt United States 15 672 0.9× 580 0.8× 388 1.0× 198 1.0× 83 0.8× 23 1.0k
Adrián Regos Spain 21 764 1.0× 551 0.8× 515 1.3× 536 2.7× 94 0.9× 63 1.3k
Núria Aquilué Spain 22 1.1k 1.5× 358 0.5× 460 1.2× 152 0.8× 151 1.4× 41 1.3k
Timothy J. Curran New Zealand 18 911 1.2× 438 0.6× 644 1.7× 120 0.6× 52 0.5× 53 1.4k
Erin Conlisk United States 16 443 0.6× 362 0.5× 462 1.2× 303 1.5× 49 0.5× 29 905
Guopeng Ren China 16 449 0.6× 465 0.7× 107 0.3× 155 0.8× 88 0.8× 40 858
David T. Cleland United States 13 726 1.0× 450 0.6× 422 1.1× 65 0.3× 115 1.1× 18 1.0k
Richard Thackway Australia 13 616 0.8× 407 0.6× 251 0.7× 71 0.4× 114 1.1× 35 921
Jan Vlok South Africa 16 401 0.5× 269 0.4× 348 0.9× 64 0.3× 123 1.1× 27 952
Grant Allan Australia 11 775 1.1× 609 0.9× 429 1.1× 81 0.4× 115 1.1× 16 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Singleton. The network helps show where Peter H. Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. Singleton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. Singleton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. Singleton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. Singleton. Peter H. Singleton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Halofsky, Joshua S., Daniel C. Donato, Peter H. Singleton, et al.. (2024). Reconciling species conservation and ecosystem resilience: Northern spotted owl habitat sustainability in a fire-dependent forest landscape. Forest Ecology and Management. 567. 122072–122072. 7 indexed citations
2.
Hessburg, Paul F., Susan Charnley, Eric M. White, et al.. (2020). The 1994 Eastside Screens large-tree harvest limit: review of science relevant to forest planning 25 years later. 990. 11 indexed citations
3.
Lesmeister, Damon B., et al.. (2018). Northern spotted owl habitat and populations: Status and threats. 245–299. 12 indexed citations
4.
Lesmeister, Damon B., Raymond J. Davis, Peter H. Singleton, & J. David Wiens. (2018). Chapter 4: Northern spotted owl habitat and populations: status and threats. 966. 245–299. 3 indexed citations
6.
Hessburg, Paul F., Thomas A. Spies, David A. Perry, et al.. (2016). Tamm Review: Management of mixed-severity fire regime forests in Oregon, Washington, and Northern California. Forest Ecology and Management. 366. 221–250. 167 indexed citations
7.
Gaines, William L., et al.. (2015). Northern spotted owl issues and objectives. 1 indexed citations
8.
Singleton, Peter H.. (2015). Forest Structure Within Barred Owl (Strix varia) Home Ranges in the Eastern Cascade Range, Washington. Journal of Raptor Research. 49(2). 129–140. 5 indexed citations
9.
Krosby, Meade, Ian Breckheimer, D. John Pierce, et al.. (2015). Focal species and landscape “naturalness” corridor models offer complementary approaches for connectivity conservation planning. Landscape Ecology. 30(10). 2121–2132. 89 indexed citations
10.
Marcot, Bruce G., Peter H. Singleton, & Nathan H. Schumaker. (2015). ANALYSIS OF SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY IN AN INDIVIDUAL‐BASED MODEL OF A THREATENED WILDLIFE SPECIES. Natural Resource Modeling. 28(1). 37–58. 20 indexed citations
11.
Lehmkuhl, John F., et al.. (2013). Forage Composition, Productivity, and Utilization in the Eastern Washington Cascade Range. Northwest Science. 87(4). 267–291. 5 indexed citations
12.
Raphael, Martin G., Paul F. Hessburg, John F. Lehmkuhl, et al.. (2013). Assessing the Compatibility of Fuel Treatments, Wildfire Risk, and Conservation of Northern Spotted Owl Habitats and Populations in the Eastern Cascades: A Multi-scale Analysis.. Insecta mundi. 3 indexed citations
13.
Singleton, Peter H., et al.. (2010). Barred Owl Space Use and Habitat Selection in the Eastern Cascades, Washington. Journal of Wildlife Management. 74(2). 285–294. 44 indexed citations
14.
Kennedy, Maureen C., E. David Ford, Peter H. Singleton, Mark A. Finney, & James K. Agee. (2007). Informed multi‐objective decision‐making in environmental management using Pareto optimality. Journal of Applied Ecology. 45(1). 181–192. 81 indexed citations
15.
Singleton, Peter H., William L. Gaines, & John F. Lehmkuhl. (2004). Landscape permeability for grizzly bear movements in Washington and southwestern British Columbia. Ursus. 15(1). 90–103. 25 indexed citations
16.
Singleton, Peter H. & William L. Gaines. (2001). Using Weighted Distance and Least-Cost Corridor Analysis to Evaluate Regional-Scale Large Carnivore Habitat Connectivity in Washington. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 10 indexed citations
17.
Gaines, William L., et al.. (2000). Conservation of rare carnivores in the North Cascades ecosystem, western North America.. Natural Areas Journal. 20(4). 366–375. 6 indexed citations
18.
Singleton, Peter H. & John F. Lehmkuhl. (2000). I-90 SNOQUALMIE PASS WILDLIFE HABITAT LINKAGE ASSESSMENT. 4 indexed citations
19.
Singleton, Peter H. & John F. Lehmkuhl. (1999). Assessing Wildlife Habitat Connectivity in the Interstate 90 Snoqualmie Pass Corridor, Washington. 14 indexed citations
20.
Singleton, Peter H.. (1995). Winter habitat selection by wolves in the North Fork of the Flathead River Basin Montana and British Columbia. The Mathematics Enthusiast. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026