Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour
2016231 citationsJane Mills, Peter Gaskell et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gaskell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gaskell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gaskell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gaskell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gaskell. The network helps show where Peter Gaskell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Gaskell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Gaskell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Gaskell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Gaskell. Peter Gaskell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mills, Jane, Peter Gaskell, N. F. Jones, & N. D. Boatman. (2013). Farmer attitudes and evaluation of outcomes to on-farm environmental management. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire). 209–216.25 indexed citations
3.
Gaskell, Peter, et al.. (2012). The Campaign for the Farmed Environment: evaluation of partnership, local and wider impacts. Final Report to Defra. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).4 indexed citations
Gaskell, Peter. (2010). Artisans and Machinery: The Moral and Physical Condition of the Manufacturing Population Considered, with Reference to Mechanical Substitutes for Human Labour. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).5 indexed citations
Boatman, N. D., Carmel Ramwell, Hazel Parry, et al.. (2008). A review of environmental benefits supplied by agri-environment schemes. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).16 indexed citations
8.
Gaskell, Peter, N. D. Boatman, Janet Dwyer, et al.. (2008). Environmental Observatory update – the implications of the 2003 CAP reform for the environment in England. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).1 indexed citations
9.
Courtney, Paul, Peter Gaskell, Jane Mills, et al.. (2008). Scoping Study on the Socio-Economic Benefits of Heritage in the National Parks - Final Report for English Heritage and Cadw. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).1 indexed citations
10.
Courtney, Paul, et al.. (2007). A Socio-economic study of grant-funded traditional drystone wall and farm building restoration in the Yorkshire Dales National Park. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).2 indexed citations
11.
Gaskell, Peter, Julie Ingram, Jane Mills, et al.. (2007). Environmental impacts of CAP reform: Assessment of implications of farm level change for environmental outcomes. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).3 indexed citations
12.
Gaskell, Peter. (2006). Valuing the historic environment. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).4 indexed citations
13.
Gaskell, Peter, et al.. (2006). Living Buildings in a Living Landscape: Finding a future for traditional Farm Buildings. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).2 indexed citations
14.
Gaskell, Peter & Stephen Owen. (2005). Historic Farm Buildings: Constructing the Evidence Base. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).8 indexed citations
15.
Gaskell, Peter, et al.. (2005). Social and Economic Impacts and Benefits of Traditional Farm Building Repair and Re-use in the Lake District ESA. Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire).1 indexed citations
Gaskell, Peter. (1972). The Manufacturing Population of England: Its Moral, Social, and Physical Conditions, and the Changes Which Have Arisen from the Use of Steam Machinery; with an Examination of Infant Labour. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).13 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.