Countries citing papers authored by Peter G. Underwood
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter G. Underwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter G. Underwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter G. Underwood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter G. Underwood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter G. Underwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter G. Underwood. The network helps show where Peter G. Underwood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter G. Underwood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter G. Underwood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter G. Underwood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter G. Underwood. Peter G. Underwood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Underwood, Peter G., et al.. (2019). Research Data Management (RDM) capabilities at the University of Ghana, Legon. Library philosophy and practice. 1.11 indexed citations
Underwood, Peter G., et al.. (2017). PERii electronic journals: Assessing access and use by postgraduate students in the School of Education at the University of Dar es Salaam. 12(1). 146–162.1 indexed citations
Underwood, Peter G., et al.. (2014). Information Literacy Learning Outcomes Among Undergraduate Law Students in Two African Universities. Law library journal. 106(3). 431–443.1 indexed citations
Kwanya, Tom, Christine Stilwell, & Peter G. Underwood. (2012). A Competency Index for Research Librarians in Kenya. African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science. 22(1). 1–18.8 indexed citations
12.
Warner, K, et al.. (2010). The Jury Experience: Insights from the Tasmanian Jury Study. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
13.
Kwanya, Tom, Christine Stilwell, & Peter G. Underwood. (2010). Library 2.0 principles and Ranganathan's fifth law.. ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal). 28(2). 1–16.1 indexed citations
14.
Darch, Colin & Peter G. Underwood. (2005). Are pre-compiled citation indexes of peer-reviewed journals an adequate control for research quality? A case study of library and information science : research article. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science. 71(1). 1–10.2 indexed citations
Owens, Alan, T. Peacock, Marcos Bavdaz, et al.. (2001). A new generation of space X-ray imagers that could help fight cancer. 108(108). 32–37.1 indexed citations
17.
Atkinson, David, et al.. (2000). Determinants of use rate of oral rehydration therapy for management of childhood diarrhoea in rural Bangladesh.. PubMed. 18(2). 103–8.17 indexed citations
18.
Underwood, Peter G.. (1996). Soft systems analysis and the management of libraires, information services and resource centres.2 indexed citations
19.
Underwood, Peter G.. (1990). Managing Change in Libraries and Information Services: A Systems Approach. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
20.
Underwood, Peter G.. (1979). Dictionary of the supernatural : an A to Z of hauntings, possession, witchcraft demonology and other occult phenomena. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.