Peter F. Renz

466 total citations
9 papers, 261 citations indexed

About

Peter F. Renz is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Infectious Diseases and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter F. Renz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 261 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 1 paper in Infectious Diseases and 1 paper in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Peter F. Renz's work include CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). Peter F. Renz is often cited by papers focused on CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). Peter F. Renz collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and Austria. Peter F. Renz's co-authors include Daniel Spies, Tobias A. Beyer, Constance Ciaudo, Ataman Sendoel, Rowan Flynn, Michael D. Moore, William James, Sally A. Cowley, Alexander Grundmann and Umesh Ghoshdastider and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Molecular Biology and Oncogene.

In The Last Decade

Peter F. Renz

9 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter F. Renz Switzerland	6	197	39	38	30	20	9	261
Janine Scholefield South Africa	10	302 1.5×	68 1.7×	18 0.5×	56 1.9×	22 1.1×	29	372
Donald W. Harms United States	8	221 1.1×	73 1.9×	26 0.7×	10 0.3×	20 1.0×	13	291
Omer Habib South Korea	9	247 1.3×	65 1.7×	18 0.5×	11 0.4×	22 1.1×	16	290
Chih-Chung Kuo United States	2	311 1.6×	59 1.5×	14 0.4×	19 0.6×	23 1.1×	4	339
Hanna A. Holland Netherlands	5	203 1.0×	32 0.8×	17 0.4×	10 0.3×	29 1.4×	6	263
Marc Zuckermann Germany	3	213 1.1×	58 1.5×	11 0.3×	26 0.9×	37 1.9×	6	251
James Y.S. Kim United States	2	397 2.0×	81 2.1×	22 0.6×	23 0.8×	30 1.5×	2	442
Anna Köferle Germany	9	373 1.9×	77 2.0×	26 0.7×	36 1.2×	13 0.7×	14	423
Jessica L. Bonnar United States	3	332 1.7×	55 1.4×	22 0.6×	27 0.9×	14 0.7×	4	374
Carmen Adriaens United States	5	446 2.3×	86 2.2×	26 0.7×	49 1.6×	32 1.6×	5	495

Countries citing papers authored by Peter F. Renz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter F. Renz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter F. Renz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter F. Renz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter F. Renz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter F. Renz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter F. Renz. The network helps show where Peter F. Renz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter F. Renz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter F. Renz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter F. Renz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter F. Renz. Peter F. Renz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Renz, Peter F., Umesh Ghoshdastider, Simona Baghai Sain, et al.. (2024). In vivo single-cell CRISPR uncovers distinct TNF programmes in tumour evolution. Nature. 632(8024). 419–428. 14 indexed citations

2.

Weber, Ramona, Umesh Ghoshdastider, Daniel Spies, et al.. (2022). Monitoring the 5′UTR landscape reveals isoform switches to drive translational efficiencies in cancer. Oncogene. 42(9). 638–650. 26 indexed citations

3.

Renz, Peter F., et al.. (2020). Some like it translated: small ORFs in the 5′UTR. Experimental Cell Research. 396(1). 112229–112229. 41 indexed citations

4.

Renz, Peter F., et al.. (2020). Inhibition of FGF and TGF-β Pathways in hESCs Identify STOX2 as a Novel SMAD2/4 Cofactor. Biology. 9(12). 470–470. 3 indexed citations

5.

Renz, Peter F., et al.. (2019). Gaining Insights into the Function of Post-Translational Protein Modification Using Genome Engineering and Molecular Cell Biology. Journal of Molecular Biology. 431(19). 3920–3932. 3 indexed citations

6.

Spies, Daniel, Peter F. Renz, Tobias A. Beyer, & Constance Ciaudo. (2017). Comparative analysis of differential gene expression tools for RNA sequencing time course data. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 20(1). 288–298. 70 indexed citations

7.

Flynn, Rowan, Alexander Grundmann, Peter F. Renz, et al.. (2015). CRISPR-mediated genotypic and phenotypic correction of a chronic granulomatous disease mutation in human iPS cells. Experimental Hematology. 43(10). 838–848.e3. 96 indexed citations

8.

Renz, Peter F. & Tobias A. Beyer. (2015). A Concise Protocol for siRNA-Mediated Gene Suppression in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Methods in molecular biology. 369–376. 3 indexed citations

9.

Inta, Dragoš, Peter F. Renz, Juan M. Lima‐Ojeda, Christof Dormann, & Peter Gass. (2013). Postweaning social isolation exacerbates neurotoxic effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 in rats. Journal of Neural Transmission. 120(11). 1605–1609. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact