Peter D. Vize

6.6k total citations
85 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Peter D. Vize is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter D. Vize has authored 85 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Molecular Biology, 19 papers in Genetics and 18 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Peter D. Vize's work include Renal and related cancers (21 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (14 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (14 papers). Peter D. Vize is often cited by papers focused on Renal and related cancers (21 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (14 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (14 papers). Peter D. Vize collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Peter D. Vize's co-authors include Thomas J. Carroll, John B. Wallingford, Xiaolan Zhou, Daniel W. Seufert, Aaron M. Zorn, J. R. E. Wells, Erik Segerdell, Kamran Karimi, Christina James‐Zorn and Adrian S. Woolf and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, The EMBO Journal and Nature Biotechnology.

In The Last Decade

Peter D. Vize

84 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter D. Vize Canada	36	2.4k	821	411	255	237	85	3.3k
Robert C. Angerer United States	39	3.7k 1.6×	878 1.1×	225 0.5×	323 1.3×	602 2.5×	77	5.4k
Lynne M. Angerer United States	41	4.1k 1.7×	860 1.0×	195 0.5×	349 1.4×	655 2.8×	81	5.7k
Franco Cotelli Italy	35	1.9k 0.8×	602 0.7×	186 0.5×	718 2.8×	138 0.6×	118	3.4k
Patrick Leahy United States	28	2.9k 1.2×	279 0.3×	91 0.2×	154 0.6×	92 0.4×	68	4.5k
Richard R. Copley United Kingdom	35	3.1k 1.3×	1.1k 1.3×	293 0.7×	360 1.4×	430 1.8×	72	5.1k
Peter R. Smith United States	41	2.2k 0.9×	1.0k 1.2×	142 0.3×	179 0.7×	65 0.3×	119	4.7k
Masamichi Yamamoto Japan	30	1.7k 0.7×	374 0.5×	331 0.8×	254 1.0×	202 0.9×	101	2.9k
Guillaume Smits Belgium	24	3.1k 1.3×	1.2k 1.5×	357 0.9×	261 1.0×	78 0.3×	55	4.7k
Satoshi Nojima Japan	34	1.3k 0.5×	237 0.3×	345 0.8×	266 1.0×	280 1.2×	122	3.2k
Andrew Ransick United States	22	1.7k 0.7×	359 0.4×	65 0.2×	58 0.2×	263 1.1×	25	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Vize

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Vize's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Vize with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Vize more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Vize

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Vize. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Vize. The network helps show where Peter D. Vize may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter D. Vize

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter D. Vize. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter D. Vize based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter D. Vize. Peter D. Vize is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Matz, Mikhail V., et al.. (2025). Whole Genome Sequencing Reveals Genetic Differences Between Symbiodiniaceae Populations Among Reproductively and Geographically Isolated Acropora Colonies in Western Australia. Ecology and Evolution. 15(1). e70771–e70771.

Telmer, Cheryl A., Kamran Karimi, Bradley I. Arshinoff, et al.. (2024). Echinobase: a resource to support the echinoderm research community. Genetics. 227(1). 11 indexed citations

Fisher, Malcolm E, Christina James‐Zorn, Virgilio Ponferrada, et al.. (2023). Xenbase: key features and resources of the Xenopus model organism knowledgebase. Genetics. 224(1). 38 indexed citations

Fisher, Malcolm E, Erik Segerdell, Nicolas Matentzoglu, et al.. (2022). The Xenopus phenotype ontology: bridging model organism phenotype data to human health and development. BMC Bioinformatics. 23(1). 99–99. 4 indexed citations

Vize, Peter D. & Aaron M. Zorn. (2016). Xenopus genomic data and browser resources. Developmental Biology. 426(2). 194–199. 10 indexed citations

Fortriede, Joshua D., Kevin A. Burns, Christina James‐Zorn, et al.. (2014). Xenbase, the Xenopus model organism database; new virtualized system, data types and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 43(D1). D756–D763. 101 indexed citations

Hoppler, Stefan & Peter D. Vize. (2012). Xenopus protocols : post-genomic approaches. Humana Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations

Dubaissi, Eamon, et al.. (2012). Antibody Development and Use in Chromogenic and Fluorescent Immunostaining. Methods in molecular biology. 917. 411–429. 5 indexed citations

Miller, Rachel K., Xiaolan Zhou, Gilbert Weidinger, et al.. (2008). Requirement of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in pronephric kidney development. Mechanisms of Development. 126(3-4). 142–159. 41 indexed citations

10.

Zhou, Xiaolan, et al.. (2007). Collectrin/tmem27 is expressed at high levels in all segments of the developing Xenopus pronephric nephron and in the Wolffian duct. Gene Expression Patterns. 8(4). 271–274. 7 indexed citations

11.

Zhou, Xiaolan, et al.. (2006). FGF is essential for both condensation and mesenchymal–epithelial transition stages of pronephric kidney tubule development. Developmental Biology. 297(1). 103–117. 45 indexed citations

12.

Vize, Peter D., Adrian S. Woolf, & Jonathan Bard. (2003). The kidney : from normal development to congenital disease. 135 indexed citations

13.

Hagman, Derek & Peter D. Vize. (2003). Mass spawning by two brittle star species, Ophioderma rubicundumand O. squamosissimum (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea), at the Flower Garden Banks, Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science. 72(3). 871–876. 19 indexed citations

14.

Lu, Pengfei, Meredith Barad, & Peter D. Vize. (2001). Xenopus p63 expression in early ectoderm and neurectoderm. Mechanisms of Development. 102(1-2). 275–278. 25 indexed citations

15.

Carroll, Thomas J. & Peter D. Vize. (1999). Synergism between Pax-8 and lim-1 in Embryonic Kidney Development. Developmental Biology. 214(1). 46–59. 122 indexed citations

16.

Seufert, Daniel W., et al.. (1999). Developmental Basis of Pronephric Defects in Xenopus Body Plan Phenotypes. Developmental Biology. 215(2). 233–242. 52 indexed citations

17.

Vize, Peter D.. (1996). DNA Sequences Mediating the Transcriptional Response of theMix.2Homeobox Gene to Mesoderm Induction. Developmental Biology. 177(1). 226–231. 72 indexed citations

18.

Vize, Peter D. & Gerald H. Thomsen. (1994). Vg1 and regional specification in vertebrates: a new role for an old molecule. Trends in Genetics. 10(10). 371–376. 14 indexed citations

19.

Vize, Peter D., et al.. (1991). Chapter 20 Assays for Gene Function in Developing Xenopus Embryos. Methods in cell biology. 36. 367–387. 136 indexed citations

20.

Vize, Peter D. & J. R. E. Wells. (1987). Isolation and characterization of the porcine growth hormone gene. Gene. 55(2-3). 339–344. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact