Peter Broderick
- Cancer Research top 5%
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 19
- Genetics top 2%
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer 6
- Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research 6
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities 6
- Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 5
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- DNA Repair Mechanisms 8
- RNA modifications and cancer 7
- Oncology top 5%
-
- Testicular diseases and treatments 6
- Co-authors
- Richard S. HoulstonAthena MatakidouJayaram VijayakrishnanYufei WangChristopher I. AmosMargaret R. SpitzQiong DongXifeng Wu
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Peter Broderick
50 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Cancer Research 594
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 652
- Genetics 813
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Oncology 548
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Broderick
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Broderick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Broderick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Broderick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Broderick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Broderick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Broderick. The network helps show where Peter Broderick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Broderick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 155 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 15 |
About Peter Broderick
Peter Broderick is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics and Genetics, having authored 51 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (19 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (6 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (6 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (6 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (594 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (652 citations) and Genetics (813 citations). Peter Broderick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Houlston, Athena Matakidou, Jayaram Vijayakrishnan, Yufei Wang, Christopher I. Amos, Margaret R. Spitz, Qiong Dong, Xifeng Wu, Xiangjun Gu and Kathleen E. Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, Nature Communications, Blood, Carcinogenesis and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.