Peter Bremen

481 total citations
19 papers, 348 citations indexed

About

Peter Bremen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Developmental Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Bremen has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 348 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Developmental Biology. Recurrent topics in Peter Bremen's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Peter Bremen is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). Peter Bremen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Peter Bremen's co-authors include John C. Middlebrooks, A. John Van Opstal, Marc M. van Wanrooij, Philip X. Joris, Justin D. Yao, Hermann Wagner, Tom P. Franken, Robert F. van der Willigen, Katrin Vonderschen and Ali Asadollahi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Journal of Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Bremen

18 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Bremen Netherlands 12 285 143 87 78 48 19 348
Bénédicte Philibert France 8 302 1.1× 149 1.0× 48 0.6× 39 0.5× 56 1.2× 10 336
Avinash D. S. Bala United States 8 195 0.7× 106 0.7× 48 0.6× 102 1.3× 26 0.5× 11 282
Diego Elgueda Chile 9 381 1.3× 196 1.4× 81 0.9× 26 0.3× 57 1.2× 12 439
Aileen Y. Huang United States 7 243 0.9× 123 0.9× 57 0.7× 77 1.0× 27 0.6× 7 303
Jemma E. Hine United Kingdom 11 505 1.8× 204 1.4× 133 1.5× 38 0.5× 56 1.2× 15 554
Haleh Farahbod United States 10 231 0.8× 205 1.4× 56 0.6× 70 0.9× 23 0.5× 13 415
Carl H. Parsons United Kingdom 10 508 1.8× 241 1.7× 199 2.3× 71 0.9× 107 2.2× 16 613
Victor Benichoux France 12 277 1.0× 116 0.8× 27 0.3× 35 0.4× 34 0.7× 20 359
Cynthia A. Prosen United States 11 231 0.8× 245 1.7× 25 0.3× 79 1.0× 63 1.3× 14 380
Ida Siveke Germany 9 219 0.8× 184 1.3× 40 0.5× 96 1.2× 43 0.9× 16 292

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bremen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bremen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bremen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bremen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bremen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bremen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bremen. The network helps show where Peter Bremen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Bremen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Bremen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Bremen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Bremen. Peter Bremen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Bremen, Peter, et al.. (2024). Heterogeneous spatial tuning in the auditory pathway of the Mongolian Gerbil ( Meriones unguiculatus ). European Journal of Neuroscience. 60(5). 4954–4981.
2.
Opstal, A. John Van, et al.. (2018). Testing the Precedence Effect in the Median Plane Reveals Backward Spatial Masking of Sound. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 8670–8670. 11 indexed citations
3.
Bremen, Peter, et al.. (2017). Audio-Visual Integration in a Redundant Target Paradigm: A Comparison between Rhesus Macaque and Man. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 11. 89–89. 9 indexed citations
4.
Yao, Justin D., Peter Bremen, & John C. Middlebrooks. (2015). Emergence of Spatial Stream Segregation in the Ascending Auditory Pathway. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(49). 16199–16212. 26 indexed citations
5.
Bremen, Peter, et al.. (2015). Central Auditory Processing of Temporal and Spectral-Variance Cues in Cochlear Implant Listeners. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0132423–e0132423. 2 indexed citations
6.
Yao, Justin D., Peter Bremen, & John C. Middlebrooks. (2015). Transformation of spatial sensitivity along the ascending auditory pathway. Journal of Neurophysiology. 113(9). 3098–3111. 11 indexed citations
7.
Franken, Tom P., Peter Bremen, & Philip X. Joris. (2014). Coincidence detection in the medial superior olive: mechanistic implications of an analysis of input spiking patterns. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 8. 42–42. 30 indexed citations
8.
Bremen, Peter & Philip X. Joris. (2013). Axonal Recordings from Medial Superior Olive Neurons Obtained from the Lateral Lemniscus of the Chinchilla (Chinchilla laniger). Journal of Neuroscience. 33(44). 17506–17518. 28 indexed citations
9.
Bremen, Peter & John C. Middlebrooks. (2013). Weighting of Spatial and Spectro-Temporal Cues for Auditory Scene Analysis by Human Listeners. PLoS ONE. 8(3). e59815–e59815. 15 indexed citations
10.
Middlebrooks, John C. & Peter Bremen. (2013). Spatial Stream Segregation by Auditory Cortical Neurons. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(27). 10986–11001. 51 indexed citations
11.
Yao, Justin D., Peter Bremen, & John C. Middlebrooks. (2013). Rat primary auditory cortex is tuned exclusively to the contralateral hemifield. Journal of Neurophysiology. 110(9). 2140–2151. 15 indexed citations
12.
Bremen, Peter, et al.. (2010). Applying double-magnetic induction to measure head-unrestrained gaze shifts: calibration and validation in monkey. Biological Cybernetics. 103(6). 415–432. 5 indexed citations
13.
Wanrooij, Marc M. van, Peter Bremen, & A. John Van Opstal. (2010). Acquired prior knowledge modulates audiovisual integration. European Journal of Neuroscience. 31(10). 1763–1771. 30 indexed citations
14.
Plachta, Dennis T. T., et al.. (2010). Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 196(3). 227–240. 12 indexed citations
15.
Bremen, Peter, Marc M. van Wanrooij, & A. John Van Opstal. (2010). Pinna Cues Determine Orienting Response Modes to Synchronous Sounds in Elevation. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(1). 194–204. 30 indexed citations
16.
Bremen, Peter, Robert F. van der Willigen, & A. John Van Opstal. (2007). Applying Double Magnetic Induction to Measure Two-Dimensional Head-Unrestrained Gaze Shifts in Human Subjects. Journal of Neurophysiology. 98(6). 3759–3769. 10 indexed citations
17.
Wagner, Hermann, et al.. (2007). Distribution of Interaural Time Difference in the Barn Owl's Inferior Colliculus in the Low- and High-Frequency Ranges. Journal of Neuroscience. 27(15). 4191–4200. 45 indexed citations
18.
Bremen, Peter, Robert F. van der Willigen, & A. John Van Opstal. (2006). Using double-magnetic induction to measure head-unrestrained gaze shifts. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 160(1). 75–84. 10 indexed citations
19.
Bremen, Peter, et al.. (2006). Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 193(1). 99–112. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026