Peter Bray
Impact in
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Paleontology top 2%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in ⓘ
- Paleontology 18
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 17
- Archeology 10
- Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts 7
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 5
- Co-authors
- A. Mark Pollard (14 shared papers)A. M. Pollard (5 shared papers)Peter Hommel (7 shared papers)Chris Gosden (4 shared papers)Ruiliang Liu (7 shared papers)Jessica Rawson (4 shared papers)Andrew Wilson (1 shared paper)Helena Hamerow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Antiquity (6 papers)Archaeometry (5 papers)Journal of Humanistic Psychology (2 papers)Archaeological Research in Asia (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandChina
In The Last Decade
Peter Bray
36 papers receiving 832 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Archeology 295
- Paleontology 547
- Space and Planetary Science 80
- Archeology 403
- Anthropology 191
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bray
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bray. The network helps show where Peter Bray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 92 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 54 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 29 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 13 |
About Peter Bray
Peter Bray is a scholar working on Paleontology, Archeology, Archeology, Anthropology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (17 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (7 papers), Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (5 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (5 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (5 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (295 citations), Paleontology (547 citations), Space and Planetary Science (80 citations), Archeology (403 citations) and Anthropology (191 citations). Peter Bray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and China. Frequent co-authors include A. Mark Pollard, A. M. Pollard, Peter Hommel, Chris Gosden, Ruiliang Liu, Jessica Rawson, Andrew Wilson, Helena Hamerow, Marcos Martinón‐Torres and Thilo Rehren. Their work appears in journals such as Antiquity, Archaeometry, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Archaeological Research in Asia and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.