Peter Boakes

973 total citations
18 papers, 667 citations indexed

About

Peter Boakes is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Boakes has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 667 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Peter Boakes's work include Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (16 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (16 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (13 papers). Peter Boakes is often cited by papers focused on Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (16 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (16 papers) and Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies (13 papers). Peter Boakes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Austria. Peter Boakes's co-authors include S. E. Milan, B. Hubert, B. Hubert, James A. Hutchinson, M. P. Freeman, R. Nakamura, Gary Abel, G. Chisham, C. Forsyth and Christian Möstl and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Peter Boakes

17 papers receiving 649 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Boakes United Kingdom 13 654 365 140 36 24 18 667
N. S. Nikolaeva Russia 17 874 1.3× 603 1.7× 101 0.7× 29 0.8× 31 1.3× 59 901
K. D. Siebert United States 17 877 1.3× 546 1.5× 148 1.1× 63 1.8× 25 1.0× 35 888
Н. Л. Бородкова Russia 12 532 0.8× 301 0.8× 84 0.6× 31 0.9× 15 0.6× 67 548
E. Huttunen Finland 7 811 1.2× 386 1.1× 56 0.4× 29 0.8× 28 1.2× 11 829
И. Г. Лодкина Russia 16 812 1.2× 563 1.5× 76 0.5× 31 0.9× 19 0.8× 50 822
Tung‐Shin Hsu United States 12 490 0.7× 315 0.9× 182 1.3× 26 0.7× 8 0.3× 17 516
K. E. J. Huttunen Finland 12 766 1.2× 441 1.2× 99 0.7× 20 0.6× 6 0.3× 20 784
Sarah Bentley United Kingdom 13 366 0.6× 161 0.4× 125 0.9× 30 0.8× 11 0.5× 27 383
D. A. Sormakov Russia 12 350 0.5× 203 0.6× 79 0.6× 25 0.7× 10 0.4× 26 361
P. Francia Italy 16 620 0.9× 424 1.2× 282 2.0× 36 1.0× 39 1.6× 74 685

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Boakes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Boakes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Boakes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Boakes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Boakes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Boakes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Boakes. The network helps show where Peter Boakes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Boakes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Boakes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Boakes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Boakes. Peter Boakes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Möstl, Christian, Martin Reiß, Tanja Amerstorfer, et al.. (2018). Statistics and parameters of solar coronal mass ejections in the inner heliosphere: what to expect for Parker Solar Probe?. EGUGA. 3293. 1 indexed citations
2.
Möstl, Christian, Tanja Amerstorfer, Erika Palmerio, et al.. (2018). Forward Modeling of Coronal Mass Ejection Flux Ropes in the Inner Heliosphere with 3DCORE. Space Weather. 16(3). 216–229. 42 indexed citations
3.
Möstl, Christian, et al.. (2016). PREDICTION OF GEOMAGNETIC STORM STRENGTH FROM INNER HELIOSPHERIC IN SITU OBSERVATIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. 833(2). 255–255. 24 indexed citations
4.
Möstl, Christian, T. Rollett, R. A. Frahm, et al.. (2015). Strong coronal channelling and interplanetary evolution of a solar storm up to Earth and Mars. Nature Communications. 6(1). 7135–7135. 120 indexed citations
5.
Wang, Guoqiang, M. Volwerk, R. Nakamura, et al.. (2014). Flapping current sheet with superposed waves seen in space and on the ground. Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics. 119(12). 23 indexed citations
6.
Forsyth, C., C. E. J. Watt, I. J. Rae, et al.. (2014). Increases in plasma sheet temperature with solar wind driving during substorm growth phases. Geophysical Research Letters. 41(24). 8713–8721. 21 indexed citations
7.
Boakes, Peter, R. Nakamura, M. Volwerk, & S. E. Milan. (2014). ECLAT Cluster Spacecraft Magnetotail Plasma Region Identifications (2001–2009). Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester). 2014(1). 24 indexed citations
8.
Сергеев, В. А., S. Dubyagin, Yukinaga Miyashita, et al.. (2012). Energetic particle injections to geostationary orbit: Relationship to flow bursts and magnetospheric state. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 117(A10). 64 indexed citations
9.
Boakes, Peter, S. E. Milan, Gary Abel, et al.. (2011). A superposed epoch investigation of the relation between magnetospheric solar wind driving and substorm dynamics with geosynchronous particle injection signatures. Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester). 12 indexed citations
10.
Hutchinson, James A., D. M. Wright, S. E. Milan, A. Grocott, & Peter Boakes. (2011). A new way to study geomagnetic storms. Astronomy & Geophysics. 52(4). 4.20–4.23. 6 indexed citations
11.
Boakes, Peter, S. E. Milan, Gary Abel, et al.. (2011). A superposed epoch investigation of the relation between magnetospheric solar wind driving and substorm dynamics with geosynchronous particle injection signatures. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 116(A1). n/a–n/a. 19 indexed citations
12.
Milan, S. E., et al.. (2009). A superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution during substorm growth, onset, and recovery. EGUGA. 5336. 1 indexed citations
13.
Milan, S. E., James A. Hutchinson, Peter Boakes, & B. Hubert. (2009). Influences on the radius of the auroral oval. Annales Geophysicae. 27(7). 2913–2924. 83 indexed citations
14.
Boakes, Peter, S. E. Milan, Gary Abel, et al.. (2009). A statistical study of the open magnetic flux content of the magnetosphere at the time of substorm onset. Geophysical Research Letters. 36(4). 33 indexed citations
15.
Milan, S. E., A. Grocott, C. Forsyth, et al.. (2009). A superposed epoch analysis of auroral evolution during substorm growth, onset and recovery: open magnetic flux control of substorm intensity. Annales Geophysicae. 27(2). 659–668. 72 indexed citations
16.
Milan, S. E., Peter Boakes, & B. Hubert. (2008). Response of the expanding/contracting polar cap to weak and strong solar wind driving: Implications for substorm onset. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 113(A9). 73 indexed citations
17.
Boakes, Peter, S. E. Milan, Gary Abel, et al.. (2008). On the use of IMAGE FUV for estimating the latitude of the open/closed magnetic field line boundary in the ionosphere. Annales Geophysicae. 26(9). 2759–2769. 49 indexed citations
18.
Milan, S. E., A. Grocott, C. Forsyth, et al.. (2008). Looking through the oval window. Astronomy & Geophysics. 49(4). 4.16–4.18.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026