Peter B. Reiner

5.6k total citations
103 papers, 4.2k citations indexed

About

Peter B. Reiner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter B. Reiner has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 4.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 38 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 20 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Peter B. Reiner's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (28 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (24 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers). Peter B. Reiner is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (28 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (24 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (13 papers). Peter B. Reiner collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Peter B. Reiner's co-authors include Kazue Semba, Steven R. Vincent, Edith G. McGeer, H.C. Fibiger, Julia Mills, Terry P. Snutch, Anita Kamondi, Nicholas S. Fitz, H. L. Haas and Gidon Felsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Peter B. Reiner

100 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter B. Reiner Canada 34 1.7k 1.7k 1.2k 701 630 103 4.2k
Oliver von Bohlen und Halbach Germany 41 2.1k 1.2× 609 0.4× 1.8k 1.4× 738 1.1× 212 0.3× 115 5.1k
Margit Burmeister United States 44 2.1k 1.2× 1.2k 0.7× 3.6k 3.0× 514 0.7× 157 0.2× 178 8.7k
James N. Davis United States 42 2.6k 1.5× 795 0.5× 1.6k 1.3× 634 0.9× 416 0.7× 130 6.1k
John Power Australia 40 2.6k 1.5× 2.0k 1.2× 1.4k 1.1× 423 0.6× 245 0.4× 142 5.9k
Wade H. Berrettini United States 44 2.0k 1.1× 725 0.4× 2.3k 1.9× 828 1.2× 407 0.6× 138 7.2k
Julie K. Staley United States 39 3.1k 1.8× 1.1k 0.6× 2.0k 1.7× 570 0.8× 160 0.3× 85 5.5k
Brian Morris United Kingdom 44 3.3k 1.9× 740 0.4× 2.6k 2.2× 906 1.3× 325 0.5× 177 5.7k
John Kelly United Kingdom 45 5.2k 3.0× 1.3k 0.7× 3.8k 3.1× 1.3k 1.8× 854 1.4× 159 7.9k
Michael L. Woodruff United States 38 2.0k 1.2× 988 0.6× 2.0k 1.7× 239 0.3× 198 0.3× 133 4.4k
Richard H. Evans United States 45 5.2k 3.0× 863 0.5× 3.9k 3.2× 1.3k 1.8× 311 0.5× 178 8.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter B. Reiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter B. Reiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter B. Reiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter B. Reiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter B. Reiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter B. Reiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter B. Reiner. The network helps show where Peter B. Reiner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter B. Reiner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter B. Reiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter B. Reiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter B. Reiner. Peter B. Reiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Nagel, Saskia K. & Peter B. Reiner. (2018). Skillful Use of Technologies of the Extended Mind Illuminate Practical Paths Toward an Ethics of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1251–1251. 5 indexed citations
3.
Schermer, Maartje, et al.. (2017). Public Attitudes Towards Moral Enhancement. Evidence that Means Matter Morally. Neuroethics. 10(3). 405–417. 16 indexed citations
4.
Cabrera, Laura Y. & Peter B. Reiner. (2015). Understanding public (mis)understanding of tDCS for enhancement. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 9. 30–30. 10 indexed citations
5.
Fitz, Nicholas S. & Peter B. Reiner. (2014). Buttressing regulation of cognitive enhancement devices with principles of harm reduction. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. 1(3). 322–327. 1 indexed citations
6.
Franke, Andreas G., et al.. (2014). Attitudes towards prescribing cognitive enhancers among primary care physicians in Germany. BMC Family Practice. 15(1). 3–3. 14 indexed citations
7.
Forlini, Cynthia, Wayne Hall, Bruce Maxwell, et al.. (2013). Navigating the enhancement landscape. EMBO Reports. 14(2). 123–128. 17 indexed citations
8.
Lam, Fred C., Peihua Lu, Adam B. Shapiro, et al.. (2001). β‐Amyloid efflux mediated by p‐glycoprotein. Journal of Neurochemistry. 76(4). 1121–1128. 313 indexed citations
9.
Thies, Robert L., et al.. (1999). Novel Effects of FCCP [Carbonyl Cyanide p‐(Trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone] on Amyloid Precursor Protein Processing. Journal of Neurochemistry. 72(4). 1457–1465. 17 indexed citations
10.
Mills, Julia & Peter B. Reiner. (1999). Regulation of Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleavage. Journal of Neurochemistry. 72(2). 443–460. 195 indexed citations
11.
Mills, Julia & Peter B. Reiner. (1999). Mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor regulation of amyloid precursor protein cleavage. Neuroscience. 94(4). 1333–1338. 18 indexed citations
12.
Vincent, Steven R., et al.. (1998). Chapter 3 Monitoring neuronal NO release in vivo in cerebellum, thalamus and hippocampus. Progress in brain research. 118. 27–35. 16 indexed citations
13.
Reiner, Peter B. & Anita Kamondi. (1994). Mechanisms of antihistamine-induced sedation in the human brain: H1 receptor activation reduces a background leakage potassium current. Neuroscience. 59(3). 579–588. 99 indexed citations
14.
Reiner, Peter B. & Michael Brenowitz. (1991). Quantitative densitometry of autoradiograms: digital images representative of optical density. Computer applications in the biosciences. 7(3). 337–340. 3 indexed citations
15.
Reiner, Peter B., et al.. (1990). A pharmacological model of ischemia in the hippocampal slice. Neuroscience Letters. 119(2). 175–178. 54 indexed citations
16.
Semba, Kazue, Peter B. Reiner, & H.C. Fibiger. (1990). Single cholinergic mesopontine tegmental neurons project to both the pontine reticular formation and the thalamus in the rat. Neuroscience. 38(3). 643–654. 149 indexed citations
17.
Reiner, Peter B., Bernd Heimrich, Flavio Keller, & Helmut L. Haas. (1988). Organotypic culture of central histamine neurons. Brain Research. 442(1). 166–170. 11 indexed citations
18.
Semba, Kazue, Peter B. Reiner, Edith G. McGeer, & H.C. Fibiger. (1988). Non-cholinergic basal forebrain neurons project to the contralateral basal forebrain in the rat. Neuroscience Letters. 84(1). 23–28. 25 indexed citations
19.
Reiner, Peter B., Kazue Semba, H.C. Fibiger, & Edith G. McGeer. (1987). Physiological evidence for subpopulations of cortically projecting basal forebrain neurons in the anesthetized rat. Neuroscience. 20(2). 629–636. 39 indexed citations
20.
Semba, Kazue, et al.. (1986). Evidence for descending basal forebrain projections anatomical and physiological studies. The Society for Neuroscience Abstracts. 12(2). 904. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026