Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice.
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter B. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter B. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter B. Gray more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter B. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter B. Gray. The network helps show where Peter B. Gray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter B. Gray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter B. Gray.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter B. Gray based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter B. Gray. Peter B. Gray is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gray, Peter B., et al.. (2015). Grown Unschoolers’ Evaluations of Their Unschooling Experiences: Report I on a Survey of 75 Unschooled Adults. CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York). 4(2). 8–32.12 indexed citations
Gray, Peter B., et al.. (2015). Grown Unschoolers’ Experiences with Higher Education and Employment: Report II on a Survey of 75 Unschooled Adults. 4(2). 33–53.4 indexed citations
9.
Gray, Peter B.. (2014). Playing to Win: Raising Children in a Competitive Culture. 7(1). 120.27 indexed citations
10.
Gray, Peter B. & Alyssa N. Crittenden. (2014). Father Darwin: Effects of Children on Men, Viewed from an Evolutionary Perspective. 12(2). 121.12 indexed citations
11.
Gray, Peter B., et al.. (2013). The Challenges and Benefits of Unschooling, According to 232 Families Who Have Chosen that Route. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.37 indexed citations
12.
Gray, Peter B., et al.. (2013). Inquiry in science education and science teacher education : research on teaching and learning through inquiry based approaches in science (teacher) education.5 indexed citations
Gray, Peter B.. (2011). The decline of play and the rise of psychopathology in children and adolescents.. 3(4). 443–463.271 indexed citations
15.
Gray, Peter B.. (2011). The Special Value of Children's Age-Mixed Play.. 3(4). 500–522.31 indexed citations
16.
Gray, Peter B., et al.. (2010). Integrated Business Core Curricula (Undergraduate): What Have We Learned in over Twenty Years?. The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal. 14. 19.5 indexed citations
17.
Gray, Peter B.. (2009). Play as a Foundation for Hunter-Gatherer Social Existence.. 1(4). 476–522.101 indexed citations
18.
Gray, Peter B.. (2008). The Value of Psychology 101 in Liberal Arts Education: A Psychocentric Theory of the University. APS observer. 21(9).1 indexed citations
Gray, Peter B. & Jay Feldman. (1997). Patterns of Age Mixing and Gender Mixing among Children and Adolescents at an Ungraded School.. Merrill-palmer Quarterly. 43(1). 67–86.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.