Penelope Austin

677 total citations
8 papers, 558 citations indexed

About

Penelope Austin is a scholar working on Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Penelope Austin has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 558 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Immunology, 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 1 paper in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Penelope Austin's work include T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers). Penelope Austin is often cited by papers focused on T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (3 papers). Penelope Austin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Penelope Austin's co-authors include John Trowsdale, Walter F. Bodmer, Susan Carson, Adrian Kelly, Alex So, Julia G. Bodmer, Richard S. Spielman, John A. T. Young, Paul Travers and Janet Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Penelope Austin

8 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Penelope Austin United Kingdom	6	393	149	114	98	64	8	558
Robert W. Knowles United States	13	365 0.9×	143 1.0×	55 0.5×	93 0.9×	38 0.6×	19	484
Gary M. Troup United States	11	339 0.9×	103 0.7×	157 1.4×	125 1.3×	34 0.5×	22	657
L. Schenning Sweden	7	488 1.2×	220 1.5×	140 1.2×	166 1.7×	18 0.3×	7	662
Amelia Kacena United States	9	220 0.6×	102 0.7×	47 0.4×	195 2.0×	81 1.3×	15	469
M Taniguchi Japan	14	686 1.7×	105 0.7×	53 0.5×	146 1.5×	205 3.2×	33	836
C C Chang United States	6	322 0.8×	144 1.0×	34 0.3×	97 1.0×	52 0.8×	8	397
T Nakagawa Japan	10	427 1.1×	151 1.0×	29 0.3×	82 0.8×	80 1.3×	14	576
Astrid Lanoue United Kingdom	6	541 1.4×	62 0.4×	68 0.6×	136 1.4×	85 1.3×	6	639
Jacqueline William United States	8	581 1.5×	158 1.1×	58 0.5×	60 0.6×	35 0.5×	12	739
G. Nagel Germany	11	276 0.7×	171 1.1×	60 0.5×	173 1.8×	138 2.2×	13	597

Countries citing papers authored by Penelope Austin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penelope Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penelope Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penelope Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penelope Austin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penelope Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penelope Austin. The network helps show where Penelope Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Penelope Austin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Penelope Austin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Penelope Austin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Penelope Austin. Penelope Austin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Austin, Penelope. (1988). Congress keen to top NIH's requests. Nature. 332(6160). 99–99. 1 indexed citations

2.

Austin, Penelope, Erik K. Flemington, Chandri Yandava, Jack L. Strominger, & Samuel H. Speck. (1988). Complex transcription of the Epstein-Barr virus BamHI fragment H rightward open reading frame 1 (BHRF1) in latently and lytically infected B lymphocytes.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 85(11). 3678–3682. 60 indexed citations

3.

Londei, Marco, et al.. (1987). Thyrocytes can synthesize HLA class II molecules. European Journal of Endocrinology. 116(1_Suppl). S82–S85. 4 indexed citations

4.

Austin, Penelope, J. G. Bodmer, Walter F. Bodmer, et al.. (1986). Monoclonal antibodies to HLA-DP-transfected mouse L cells.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 83(10). 3417–3421. 40 indexed citations

5.

Austin, Penelope, John Trowsdale, Christopher E. Rudd, et al.. (1985). Functional expression of HLA-DP genes transfected into mouse fibroblasts. Nature. 313(5997). 61–64. 83 indexed citations

6.

Trowsdale, John, John A. T. Young, Adrian Kelly, et al.. (1985). Structure, Sequence and Polymorphism in the HLA‐D Region. Immunological Reviews. 85(1). 5–44. 255 indexed citations

7.

Trowsdale, John, Adrian Kelly, Janet Lee, et al.. (1984). Linkage map of two HLA-SBβ and two HLA-SBα-related genes: an intron in one of the SBβ genes contains a processed pseudogene. Cell. 38(1). 241–249. 91 indexed citations

8.

Ellis, Desmond & Penelope Austin. (1971). Menstruation and Aggressive Behavior in a Correctional Center for Women. The Journal of Criminal Law Criminology and Police Science. 62(3). 388–388. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact