Peer Lukat
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 5
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- Wulf Blankenfeldt (12 shared papers)Rolf Müller (5 shared papers)Oliver Einsle (2 shared papers)Mark Brönstrup (2 shared papers)Silke C. Wenzel (2 shared papers)Yohei Katsuyama (1 shared paper)Claudia König (1 shared paper)Peter M. H. Kroneck (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)RNA (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Peer Lukat
17 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Pharmacology 105
- Biochemistry 33
- Biological Psychiatry 8
- Molecular Biology 213
- Biotechnology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Peer Lukat
This map shows the geographic impact of Peer Lukat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer Lukat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer Lukat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peer Lukat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer Lukat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer Lukat. The network helps show where Peer Lukat may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peer Lukat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 1 |
About Peer Lukat
Peer Lukat is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Clinical Biochemistry, Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, having authored 17 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (105 citations), Biochemistry (33 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations), Molecular Biology (213 citations) and Biotechnology (26 citations). Peer Lukat has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Wulf Blankenfeldt, Rolf Müller, Oliver Einsle, Mark Brönstrup, Silke C. Wenzel, Yohei Katsuyama, Claudia König, Peter M. H. Kroneck, Albrecht Messerschmidt and Jörg Simon. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Scientific Reports, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Nature Communications and RNA.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.