Paul Musters

455 total citations
8 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

Paul Musters is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Musters has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 2 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Paul Musters's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (4 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers). Paul Musters is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (7 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (4 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers). Paul Musters collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and United States. Paul Musters's co-authors include Koen Nieman, Tjebbe W. Galema, Marisa M. Lubbers, André Niezen, M. G. Myriam Hunink, Adriaan Coenen, Tobias A. Bruning, Boudewijn J. Krenning, Mohamed Ouhlous and Admir Dedic and has published in prestigious journals such as European Heart Journal, The American Journal of Cardiology and Heart.

In The Last Decade

Paul Musters

8 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul Musters Netherlands 7 261 134 90 77 13 8 283
M. Cerqueira Portugal 3 297 1.1× 127 0.9× 120 1.3× 70 0.9× 13 1.0× 7 328
Deepak Thomas United States 5 233 0.9× 114 0.9× 94 1.0× 50 0.6× 25 1.9× 14 277
Leonardo Sara Brazil 4 285 1.1× 121 0.9× 117 1.3× 91 1.2× 10 0.8× 6 304
André Niezen Netherlands 7 241 0.9× 121 0.9× 98 1.1× 86 1.1× 16 1.2× 8 279
Kamilla Bech Pedersen Denmark 5 293 1.1× 155 1.2× 69 0.8× 232 3.0× 8 0.6× 8 305
Felix Keng Singapore 7 195 0.7× 163 1.2× 45 0.5× 46 0.6× 10 0.8× 16 252
Eduardo Cwajg United States 5 221 0.8× 191 1.4× 34 0.4× 71 0.9× 7 0.5× 11 278
Valerie Wasserleben United States 7 415 1.6× 215 1.6× 150 1.7× 96 1.2× 17 1.3× 8 446
Eliana Reyes United Kingdom 10 236 0.9× 99 0.7× 69 0.8× 33 0.4× 10 0.8× 29 255
Sean Hayes United States 5 336 1.3× 186 1.4× 84 0.9× 161 2.1× 6 0.5× 7 356

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Musters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Musters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Musters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Musters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Musters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Musters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Musters. The network helps show where Paul Musters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Musters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Musters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Musters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Musters. Paul Musters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Nous, Fay M. A., et al.. (2020). Prognostic Value of Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Identified by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography. The American Journal of Cardiology. 126. 16–22. 11 indexed citations
2.
Lubbers, Marisa M., Adriaan Coenen, Marcel J.M. Kofflard, et al.. (2017). Comprehensive Cardiac CT With Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Versus Functional Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 11(11). 1625–1636. 73 indexed citations
3.
Lubbers, Marisa M., Adriaan Coenen, Tobias A. Bruning, et al.. (2017). Sex Differences in the Performance of Cardiac Computed Tomography Compared With Functional Testing in Evaluating Stable Chest Pain. Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging. 10(2). 18 indexed citations
4.
Lubbers, Marisa M., Admir Dedic, Adriaan Coenen, et al.. (2016). Calcium imaging and selective computed tomography angiography in comparison to functional testing for suspected coronary artery disease: the multicentre, randomized CRESCENT trial. European Heart Journal. 37(15). 1232–1243. 113 indexed citations
5.
Heuvel, Mieke van den, Oana Sorop, Paul Musters, et al.. (2015). Peripheral arterial tonometry cannot detect patients at low risk of coronary artery disease. Netherlands Heart Journal. 23(10). 468–474. 1 indexed citations
7.
Nieman, Koen, Tjebbe W. Galema, Annick C. Weustink, et al.. (2009). Computed tomography versus exercise electrocardiography in patients with stable chest complaints: real-world experiences from a fast-track chest pain clinic. Heart. 95(20). 1669–1675. 34 indexed citations
8.
Nieman, Koen, Tjebbe W. Galema, Lisan A. Neefjes, et al.. (2009). Comparison of the Value of Coronary Calcium Detection to Computed Tomographic Angiography and Exercise Testing in Patients With Chest Pain. The American Journal of Cardiology. 104(11). 1499–1504. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026