Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay
20102.5k citationsPaul Demorest, Timothy T. Pennucci et al.profile →
THE NANOGRAV NINE-YEAR DATA SET: MASS AND GEOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF BINARY MILLISECOND PULSARS
2016420 citationsEmmanuel Fonseca, Timothy T. Pennucci et al.The Astrophysical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Demorest's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Demorest with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Demorest more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Demorest. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Demorest. The network helps show where Paul Demorest may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Demorest
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Demorest.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Demorest based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Demorest. Paul Demorest is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lewandowska, N., Paul Demorest, M. A. McLaughlin, Patrick Kilian, & T. H. Hankins. (2022). Single Pulse Dispersion Measure of the Crab Pulsar. The Astrophysical Journal. 935(2). 84–84.1 indexed citations
Bower, Geoffrey C., Soumya Chatterjee, J. M. Cordes, et al.. (2020). ngVLAKey Science Goal 4: Fundamental Physics with Galactic Center Pulsars. AAS.1 indexed citations
Fonseca, Emmanuel, Paul Demorest, S. M. Ransom, & I. H. Stairs. (2019). Fundamental Physics with Radio Millisecond Pulsars. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(3). 425.3 indexed citations
13.
Ransom, S. M., Adam Brazier, Shami Chatterjee, et al.. (2019). The NANOGrav Program for Gravitational Waves and Fundamental Physics. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 51(7). 195.7 indexed citations
14.
Fonseca, Emmanuel, Timothy T. Pennucci, Justin A. Ellis, et al.. (2016). THE NANOGRAV NINE-YEAR DATA SET: MASS AND GEOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS OF BINARY MILLISECOND PULSARS. The Astrophysical Journal. 832(2). 167–167.420 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Pennucci, Timothy T., Paul Demorest, & S. M. Ransom. (2016). Pulse Portraiture: Pulsar timing. Astrophysics Source Code Library.3 indexed citations
Ransom, S. M., et al.. (2009). GUPPI: Green Bank Ultimate Pulsar Processing Instrument. 214.3 indexed citations
19.
Ray, Paul S., M. T. Wolff, Paul Demorest, et al.. (2008). X-ray and Radio Timing of PSR B1821–24. AIP conference proceedings. 983. 157–159.2 indexed citations
20.
Demorest, Paul, et al.. (2004). Precision Pulsar Timing and Gravity Waves: Recent Advances in Instrumentation. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 205.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.