Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Collier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Collier. The network helps show where Paul Collier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Collier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Collier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Collier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Collier. Paul Collier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Betts, Alexander & Paul Collier. (2018). How Europe Can Reform Its Migration Policy. Foreign Affairs.1 indexed citations
2.
Betts, Alexander & Paul Collier. (2016). Jordan’s refugee experiment: a new model for helping the displaced in Jordan. Foreign Affairs.1 indexed citations
3.
Betts, Alexander & Paul Collier. (2015). Help Refugees Help Themselves. Foreign Affairs. 94(6). 12.5 indexed citations
Collier, Paul, Anke Hoeffler, & Måns Söderbom. (2008). Post-Conflict Risks. Journal of Peace Research. 45(4). 461–478.288 indexed citations
9.
Venables, Anthony J. & Paul Collier. (2008). Illusory Revenues: Tariffs in Resource-Rich and Aid-Rich Economies. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
10.
Collier, Paul. (2008). The Politics of Hunger: How Illusion and Greed Fan the Food Crisis.. Foreign Affairs. 87(6).104 indexed citations
11.
Collier, Paul. (2008). The Politics of Hunger. Foreign Affairs.35 indexed citations
12.
Collier, Paul. (2007). Selected papers from the ADB/AERC International conference on accelerating Africa's development: five years into the twenty-first century. African Development Review. 19(1). 255.3 indexed citations
13.
Collier, Paul & Benedikt Goderis. (2007). Prospects for Commodity Exporters. World Economy. 8(2). 1–15.17 indexed citations
14.
Collier, Paul & Nicholas Sambanis. (2005). Understanding civil war : evidence and analysis. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).150 indexed citations
15.
Collier, Paul & Nicholas Sambanis. (2005). Understanding Civil War : Evidence and Analysis, Volume 2. Europe, Central Asia, and Other Regions. World Bank Publications.3 indexed citations
16.
Collier, Paul. (2001). Ethnicity, Politics and Economic Performance. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).5 indexed citations
17.
Collier, Paul & Colin Mayer. (1989). Financial Liberalization, Financial Systems, and Economic Growth: The Assessment. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 5(4). 1–12.3 indexed citations
Collier, Paul & James Pemberton. (1982). Alternative Approaches to Unemployment.. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.