Paul Chadwick
- Pharmacy top 1%
- Obesity and Health Practices 9
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 18
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health Policy Implementation Science 5
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 6
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 5
-
- Diabetes Management and Education 5
-
- Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues 4
-
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy 4
Paul Chadwick
49 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Pharmacy 245
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 777
- General Health Professions 447
- Applied Psychology 90
- Clinical Psychology 268
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Chadwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Chadwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Chadwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Chadwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Chadwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Chadwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Chadwick. The network helps show where Paul Chadwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Chadwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 256 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 32 | |
| 16 | The MEND Trial: Sustained improvements on health outcomes in obese children at one year | 2007 | 3 |
| 17 | The MEND Programme: effects on waist circumference and BMI in moderately obese children | 2007 | 4 |
| 18 | The MEND RCT: Effectiveness on health outcomes in obese children. | 2007 | 5 |
| 19 | Is the MEND programme effective in improving health outcomes in obese children? | 2006 | 3 |
| 20 | Right on target [Arguments for maintaining the ABC in public ownership.] | 1996 | 0 |
About Paul Chadwick
Paul Chadwick is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (18 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (5 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (5 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (245 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (777 citations) and General Health Professions (447 citations). Paul Chadwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Sacher, Tim Cole, Maria Kolotourou, Margaret Lawson, Atul Singhal, Alan Lucas, Helen Skouteris, Boyd Swinburn, Marita P. McCabe and Helen Croker. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetic Medicine, Nutrition Bulletin, International Journal of Obesity, Childhood Obesity and Journal of Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.