Patten Smith

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Patten Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Patten Smith has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Patten Smith's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (3 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers). Patten Smith is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (5 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (3 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers). Patten Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Patten Smith's co-authors include James Nazroo, Tariq Modood, J.R.A. Lakey, Satnam Virdee, Richard Berthoud, Patrick Sturgis, Caroline Roberts, Robert F. Anda, Patrick Remington and Luis G. Escobedo and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Public Health and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).

In The Last Decade

Patten Smith

19 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Ethnic minorities in Britain Diversity and disadvantage 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Patten Smith United Kingdom 12 730 346 210 176 149 23 1.5k
Linda McKie United Kingdom 25 750 1.0× 443 1.3× 158 0.8× 156 0.9× 177 1.2× 80 1.8k
Heikki Hiilamo Finland 19 354 0.5× 470 1.4× 174 0.8× 203 1.2× 96 0.6× 105 1.4k
Sei‐Hill Kim United States 24 910 1.2× 321 0.9× 149 0.7× 144 0.8× 61 0.4× 62 2.1k
Toni Makkai Australia 22 868 1.2× 312 0.9× 269 1.3× 176 1.0× 75 0.5× 86 2.0k
Dean R. Lillard United States 19 386 0.5× 279 0.8× 82 0.4× 52 0.3× 143 1.0× 57 1.1k
Yao Lu United States 27 1.4k 1.9× 471 1.4× 252 1.2× 474 2.7× 230 1.5× 79 2.3k
Pat Armstrong Canada 26 662 0.9× 1.2k 3.5× 255 1.2× 195 1.1× 269 1.8× 108 2.1k
Virgínia Berridge United Kingdom 27 640 0.9× 659 1.9× 130 0.6× 465 2.6× 59 0.4× 189 2.4k
John Western Australia 20 630 0.9× 344 1.0× 75 0.4× 216 1.2× 242 1.6× 104 1.6k
Caroline Andrew Canada 19 384 0.5× 267 0.8× 195 0.9× 101 0.6× 50 0.3× 94 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Patten Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patten Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patten Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patten Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patten Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patten Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patten Smith. The network helps show where Patten Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patten Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patten Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patten Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patten Smith. Patten Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sturgis, Patrick, Nick J. Baker, Mario Callegaro, et al.. (2016). Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British general election opinion polls. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 66 indexed citations
2.
Heath, Oliver, et al.. (2015). Research Note: Partisan Priming and Subjective Evaluations of the Economy: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties. 25(4). 530–542. 2 indexed citations
3.
Sturgis, Patrick, Caroline Roberts, & Patten Smith. (2012). Middle Alternatives Revisited. Sociological Methods & Research. 43(1). 15–38. 167 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Patten. (2011). Viewpoint: Lessons from Academia. International Journal of Market Research. 53(4). 451–453. 2 indexed citations
5.
Sturgis, Patrick & Patten Smith. (2010). Assessing the Validity of Generalized Trust Questions: What Kind of Trust are We Measuring?. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
6.
Sturgis, Patrick, Nick Allum, & Patten Smith. (2009). An Experiment on the Measurement of Political Knowledge in Surveys. SSRN Electronic Journal.
7.
Campbell, John, et al.. (2009). The GP Patient Survey for use in primary care in the National Health Service in the UK – development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Family Practice. 10(1). 57–57. 124 indexed citations
8.
Sturgis, Patrick & Patten Smith. (2009). Fictitious Issues Revisited: Political Interest, Knowledge and the Generation of Nonattitudes. Political Studies. 58(1). 66–84. 34 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Patten. (2009). Viewpoint: Survey Research - Two Types of Knowledge. International Journal of Market Research. 51(6). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Patten. (2009). Viewpoint: Survey Research - Two Types of Knowledge. International Journal of Market Research. 51(6). 719–721. 1 indexed citations
11.
Sturgis, Patrick, et al.. (2007). Response Order, Party Choice, and Evaluations of the National Economy: A Survey Experiment. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
12.
Sturgis, Patrick, et al.. (2006). A study of suitable methods for raising response rates in school surveys. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 19 indexed citations
13.
Barnett, Sarah A., et al.. (2001). National survey of child support agency clients research report. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
14.
Modood, Tariq, Richard Berthoud, J.R.A. Lakey, et al.. (1997). Ethnic minorities in Britain Diversity and disadvantage. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 767 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Smith, Patten, Patrick Remington, David F. Williamson, & Robert F. Anda. (1990). A comparison of alcohol sales data with survey data on self-reported alcohol use in 21 states.. American Journal of Public Health. 80(3). 309–312. 74 indexed citations
16.
Raffe, David & Patten Smith. (1987). Young People's Attitudes to YTS: the first two years. British Educational Research Journal. 13(3). 241–260. 16 indexed citations
17.
Gaskell, George & Patten Smith. (1985). An investigation of youths' attributions for unemployment and their political attitudes. Journal of Economic Psychology. 6(1). 65–80. 16 indexed citations
18.
Gaskell, George & Patten Smith. (1984). Young blacks’ hostility to the police: An investigation into its causes. New Community. 12(1). 66–74. 6 indexed citations
19.
Gaskell, George & Patten Smith. (1984). Relative deprivation in black and white youth: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Social Psychology. 23(2). 121–131. 10 indexed citations
20.
Gaskell, George & Patten Smith. (1981). ‘Alienated’ black youth: An investigation of ‘conventional wisdom’ explanations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 9(2). 182–193. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026