Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches
2020413 citationsAndy Stirling, Adrian Ely et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick van Zwanenberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick van Zwanenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick van Zwanenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick van Zwanenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick van Zwanenberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick van Zwanenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick van Zwanenberg. The network helps show where Patrick van Zwanenberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick van Zwanenberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick van Zwanenberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick van Zwanenberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick van Zwanenberg. Patrick van Zwanenberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zwanenberg, Patrick van, et al.. (2017). Open and Collaborative Developments. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).3 indexed citations
6.
Ely, Adrian, Patrick van Zwanenberg, & Andy Stirling. (2015). Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: new approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation (translation into Mandarin). Figshare.
Zwanenberg, Patrick van, Adrian Ely, & Andy Stirling. (2009). Emerging Technologies and Opportunities for International Science and Technology Foresight. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).5 indexed citations
Millstone, Erik, Patrick van Zwanenberg, Claire Marris, Les Levidow, & Helge Torgersen. (2004). Science in trade disputes related to potential risk: comparative case studies. Research Portal (King's College London).4 indexed citations
14.
Millstone, Erik, Patrick van Zwanenberg, Claire Marris, Les Levidow, & Helge Torgersen. (2004). Science in trade disputes related to potential risks: comparative case studies. ESTO Report. Figshare.9 indexed citations
15.
Zwanenberg, Patrick van & Erik Millstone. (2003). BSE: A Paradigm of Policy Failure. The Political Quarterly. 74(1). 27–37.16 indexed citations
16.
Millstone, Erik & Patrick van Zwanenberg. (2002). The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century: late lessons from early warnings. Figshare.4 indexed citations
Trichopoulou, Antonia, Erik Millstone, T. Lang, et al.. (2000). European Policy on Food Safety : Report to the European Parliament's Scienctific and Technological Options Assessment Programme (STOA). University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.