Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick S. Herendeen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick S. Herendeen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick S. Herendeen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick S. Herendeen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick S. Herendeen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick S. Herendeen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick S. Herendeen. The network helps show where Patrick S. Herendeen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick S. Herendeen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick S. Herendeen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick S. Herendeen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick S. Herendeen. Patrick S. Herendeen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ansorge, Jörg, Gloria Arratia, Gregg F. Gunnell, et al.. (2006). The maar lake of Mahenge (Tanzania) - unique evidence of Eocene terrestrial environments in sub-Sahara Africa. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften. 157(2-3). 99–120.8 indexed citations
12.
Hoot, Sara B., Patrick S. Herendeen, & Peter R. Crane. (1995). Phylogenetic relationships and floral morphology in the family Circaeasteraceae (Circaeaster and Kingdonia). American Journal of Botany. 82.1 indexed citations
13.
Lupia, Richard, Patrick S. Herendeen, & Peter R. Crane. (1995). Late Cretaceous fossil flower (Georgia, USA) of possible myrtalean affinity: Morphology and paleoecology. American Journal of Botany. 82. 87–88.2 indexed citations
14.
Crane, Peter R., Patrick S. Herendeen, & Andrew N. Drinnan. (1994). A new fossil flora from the Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) of central Georgia. American Journal of Botany. 81. 90–91.1 indexed citations
15.
Herendeen, Patrick S. & David L. Dilcher. (1992). The fossil record.6 indexed citations
16.
Herendeen, Patrick S. & David L. Dilcher. (1989). Fossil history of the Leguminosae: Winged pods from the Tertiary of North America. American Journal of Botany. 76.1 indexed citations
17.
Dilcher, David L., Patrick S. Herendeen, & Francis M. Hueber. (1989). Fossil Acacia flowers with attached anther glands from Dominican Republic amber. American Journal of Botany. 76. 33–42.13 indexed citations
18.
Herendeen, Patrick S. & David L. Dilcher. (1988). A fossil legume pod with affinities to the Detarieae-Amherstieae (Caesalpinioideae) from the Eocene of southeastern North America. American Journal of Botany. 75.1 indexed citations
19.
Herendeen, Patrick S. & David L. Dilcher. (1987). Fossil Leguminosae from the Eocene of western Kentucky: Bipinnate leaves with affinities to the Ingeae. American Journal of Botany. 74.2 indexed citations
20.
Herendeen, Patrick S. & David L. Dilcher. (1986). Fossil Leguminosae from western Kentucky and Tennessee. American Journal of Botany. 73.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.