Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
On the Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Blockchain Technology: A Perspective About Security
202449 citationsPaolo Sernani, Emanuele Frontoni et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Paolo Sernani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paolo Sernani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paolo Sernani more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paolo Sernani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paolo Sernani. The network helps show where Paolo Sernani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paolo Sernani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paolo Sernani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paolo Sernani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Paolo Sernani. Paolo Sernani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2021). Italian Sign Language Alphabet Recognition from Surface EMG and IMU Sensors with a Deep Neural Network.. Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento). 74–83.5 indexed citations
9.
Calvaresi, Davide, et al.. (2018). Timing Reliability for Local Schedulers in Multi-Agent Systems.. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 1–15.3 indexed citations
Calvaresi, Davide, et al.. (2016). Exploiting a Touchless Interaction to Drive a Wireless Mobile Robot Powered by a Real-time Operating System.. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 1746. 1–10.2 indexed citations
13.
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2016). A Touchless Human-machine Interface for the Control of an Elevator.. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 1746. 58–65.3 indexed citations
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2014). Using 3D simulators for the Ambient Assisted Living. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 16–20.3 indexed citations
16.
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2013). Subject-dependent degrees of reliability to solve a face recognition problem using multiple neural networks. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 11–14.1 indexed citations
17.
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2013). A hierarchical hybrid model for intelligent cyber-physical systems. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 1–6.6 indexed citations
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2013). A Multi-Agent Solution for the Interoperability Issue in Health Information Systems.. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche). 24–29.4 indexed citations
20.
Sernani, Paolo, et al.. (2013). Home Care Expert Systems for Ambient Assisted Living: A Multi-Agent Approach.. Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche).11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.