Panos Paris

446 total citations
13 papers, 218 citations indexed

About

Panos Paris is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Panos Paris has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 218 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Panos Paris's work include Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers). Panos Paris is often cited by papers focused on Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art (8 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers) and Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (4 papers). Panos Paris collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Panos Paris's co-authors include Liz Gulliford, Kristján Kristjánsson, Jonathan Webber and Anneli Jefferson and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Development, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Journal of Moral Education.

In The Last Decade

Panos Paris

13 papers receiving 209 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Panos Paris United Kingdom	8	96	62	62	42	40	13	218
Jenny L. Vaydich United States	3	82 0.9×	69 1.1×	14 0.2×	26 0.6×	57 1.4×	9	173
Kathryn Iurino United States	4	69 0.7×	98 1.6×	13 0.2×	19 0.5×	87 2.2×	4	213
Ian M. Church United States	6	38 0.4×	84 1.4×	80 1.3×	17 0.4×	61 1.5×	15	190
Christopher L. Suhler United States	5	129 1.3×	104 1.7×	28 0.5×	4 0.1×	78 1.9×	8	240
Patrick Stokes Australia	9	24 0.3×	54 0.9×	138 2.2×	16 0.4×	29 0.7×	37	268
Trisha L. Weeks United States	5	47 0.5×	83 1.3×	7 0.1×	24 0.6×	99 2.5×	6	235
Elliott Ihm United States	7	37 0.4×	97 1.6×	8 0.1×	34 0.8×	88 2.2×	10	233
Joshua W. Clegg United States	9	18 0.2×	87 1.4×	43 0.7×	20 0.5×	35 0.9×	29	208
Antonino Costanzo Italy	8	24 0.3×	49 0.8×	10 0.2×	71 1.7×	164 4.1×	14	286
Nikos Xanidis United Kingdom	3	20 0.2×	28 0.5×	8 0.1×	74 1.8×	153 3.8×	4	204

Countries citing papers authored by Panos Paris

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Panos Paris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Panos Paris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Panos Paris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Panos Paris

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Panos Paris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Panos Paris. The network helps show where Panos Paris may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Panos Paris

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Panos Paris. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Panos Paris based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Panos Paris. Panos Paris is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Paris, Panos. (2023). Delineating beauty: On form and the boundaries of the aesthetic. Ratio. 37(1). 76–87. 2 indexed citations

2.

Jefferson, Anneli, et al.. (2022). Introduction. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 92. 1–3. 1 indexed citations

3.

Paris, Panos, et al.. (2022). Educating Character Through the Arts. ORCA Online Research @Cardiff. 3 indexed citations

4.

Paris, Panos. (2022). On the Importance of Beauty and Taste. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 92. 229–252. 1 indexed citations

5.

Paris, Panos. (2021). The Aesthetics of Ethics: Exemplarism, Beauty, and the Psychology of Morality. The Journal of Value Inquiry. 56(4). 601–625. 2 indexed citations

6.

Gulliford, Liz, et al.. (2019). Phronesis and the Knowledge-Action Gap in Moral Psychology and Moral Education: A New Synthesis?. Human Development. 62(3). 101–129. 139 indexed citations

7.

Paris, Panos. (2019). Moral beauty and education. Journal of Moral Education. 48(4). 395–411. 9 indexed citations

8.

Paris, Panos. (2019). Functional Beauty, Pleasure, and Experience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 98(3). 516–530. 11 indexed citations

9.

Paris, Panos. (2018). The ‘Moralism’ in Immoralism: A Critique of Immoralism in Aesthetics. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 59(1). 13–33. 8 indexed citations

10.

Paris, Panos. (2018). On Form, and the Possibility of Moral Beauty. Metaphilosophy. 49(5). 711–729. 9 indexed citations

11.

Paris, Panos. (2017). The Empirical Case for Moral Beauty. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 96(4). 642–656. 16 indexed citations

12.

Paris, Panos. (2017). The Deformity-Related Conception of Ugliness. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 57(2). 139–160. 10 indexed citations

13.

Paris, Panos. (2016). Scepticism about Virtue and the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Utilitas. 29(4). 423–452. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact