Pam Carter

1.6k total citations
27 papers, 895 citations indexed

About

Pam Carter is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Pam Carter has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 895 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Education and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Pam Carter's work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). Pam Carter is often cited by papers focused on Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers). Pam Carter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and United States. Pam Carter's co-authors include Mary Dixon‐Woods, Graeme Laurie, Margareth Crisóstomo Portela, Peter J. Pronovost, Thomas Woodcock, Graham Martin, Clare Jinks, Mike Dent, Mark Smith and Roger Beech and has published in prestigious journals such as Lara D. Veeken, Implementation Science and Sociology.

In The Last Decade

Pam Carter

25 papers receiving 839 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pam Carter United Kingdom 12 390 237 129 125 116 27 895
Stuart C. Gilman United States 17 337 0.9× 259 1.1× 107 0.8× 149 1.2× 92 0.8× 59 975
Erica Di Ruggiero Canada 16 649 1.7× 247 1.0× 216 1.7× 139 1.1× 116 1.0× 114 1.4k
Charo Rodríguez Canada 17 728 1.9× 389 1.6× 150 1.2× 49 0.4× 117 1.0× 82 1.3k
Damien Contandriopoulos Canada 18 805 2.1× 165 0.7× 149 1.2× 57 0.5× 232 2.0× 69 1.3k
Alison Powell United Kingdom 16 542 1.4× 168 0.7× 64 0.5× 74 0.6× 125 1.1× 40 1.1k
Mary Thoesen Coleman United States 18 455 1.2× 348 1.5× 119 0.9× 103 0.8× 167 1.4× 42 1.2k
Robin Miller United Kingdom 20 580 1.5× 110 0.5× 134 1.0× 111 0.9× 108 0.9× 110 1.3k
Emmeline Chuang United States 23 822 2.1× 243 1.0× 186 1.4× 100 0.8× 146 1.3× 93 1.4k
Hester van de Bovenkamp Netherlands 20 780 2.0× 214 0.9× 149 1.2× 61 0.5× 282 2.4× 80 1.3k
Michelle Farr United Kingdom 17 588 1.5× 241 1.0× 102 0.8× 40 0.3× 57 0.5× 42 976

Countries citing papers authored by Pam Carter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Carter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Carter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Carter. The network helps show where Pam Carter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pam Carter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pam Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pam Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pam Carter. Pam Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Carter, Pam, et al.. (2021). How treatment burden affects the carer: the experiences of three individuals, a mother, a daughter and a husband. Breathe. 17(1). 200327–200327. 1 indexed citations
2.
Carter, Pam, Mike Dent, & Graham Martin. (2019). Conflicting Logics of Public Relations in the English NHS: A Qualitative Study of Communications and Engagement. Sociological Research Online. 24(3). 376–393. 4 indexed citations
3.
Carter, Pam & Graham Martin. (2017). Engagement of patients and the public in NHS sustainability and transformation: An ethnographic study. Critical Social Policy. 38(4). 707–727. 10 indexed citations
4.
Martin, Graham, Pam Carter, & Mike Dent. (2017). Major health service transformation and the public voice: conflict, challenge or complicity?. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 23(1). 28–35. 37 indexed citations
5.
Carter, Pam & Graham Martin. (2016). Challenges Facing Healthwatch, a New Consumer Champion in England. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 5(4). 259–263. 9 indexed citations
6.
Jinks, Clare, Pam Carter, Robert Taylor, et al.. (2016). Patient and public involvement in primary care research - an example of ensuring its sustainability. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2(1). 1–1. 47 indexed citations
7.
Carter, Pam. (2016). Time tactics: Project managing policy implementation in a network. Time & Society. 28(2). 721–742. 7 indexed citations
8.
Carter, Pam. (2016). Governing spaces: a multi-sited ethnography of governing welfare reform at close range and at a distance. Critical Policy Studies. 12(1). 3–23. 8 indexed citations
9.
Carter, Pam, Graeme Laurie, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2015). The social licence for research: whycare.dataran into trouble. Journal of Medical Ethics. 41(5). 404–409. 228 indexed citations
10.
Portela, Margareth Crisóstomo, Peter J. Pronovost, Thomas Woodcock, Pam Carter, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2015). How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. BMJ Quality & Safety. 24(5). 325–336. 199 indexed citations
11.
Portela, Margareth Crisóstomo, Peter J. Pronovost, Thomas Woodcock, Pam Carter, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2015). Republished: How to study improvement interventions: a brief overview of possible study types. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 91(1076). 343–354. 34 indexed citations
12.
Carter, Pam, Piotr Ozierański, Sarah McNicol, Maxine Power, & Mary Dixon‐Woods. (2014). How collaborative are quality improvement collaboratives: a qualitative study in stroke care. Implementation Science. 9(1). 32–32. 40 indexed citations
13.
Jinks, Clare, Pam Carter, Roger Beech, et al.. (2013). Sustaining patient and public involvement in research: A case study of a research centre. PubMed. 7(4). 146–154. 24 indexed citations
14.
Strauss, Vicky Y., Pam Carter, Bie Nio Ong, et al.. (2012). Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey. Lara D. Veeken. 51(11). 2075–2082. 9 indexed citations
15.
Carter, Pam. (2012). Policy as palimpsest. Policy & Politics. 40(3). 423–443. 39 indexed citations
16.
Carter, Pam. (2011). Governing welfare reform symbolically: evidence based or iconic policy?. Critical Policy Studies. 5(3). 247–263. 6 indexed citations
17.
Carter, Pam. (2006). David Grant, Cynthia Hardy, Cliff Oswick and Linda Putnam (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Discourse, Sage, London, 2004, 429pp. ISBN 0 7619 7225 0. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 21(1). 92–95. 1 indexed citations
18.
Carter, Pam, et al.. (1998). Conceptualising practice with older people: friendship and conversation. Ageing and Society. 18(1). 79–99. 8 indexed citations
19.
Carter, Pam. (1993). The problem of men: a reply to Keith Pringle, CSP Issue 36. Critical Social Policy. 13(38). 100–106. 7 indexed citations
20.
Carter, Pam, et al.. (1989). Social work and social welfare yearbook. Open University Press eBooks. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026