P. W. Hoff

428 total citations
11 papers, 325 citations indexed

About

P. W. Hoff is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, P. W. Hoff has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 325 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 5 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in P. W. Hoff's work include Laser Design and Applications (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers). P. W. Hoff is often cited by papers focused on Laser Design and Applications (8 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (3 papers). P. W. Hoff collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Norway. P. W. Hoff's co-authors include C. K. Rhodes, E. M. George, Thomas J. Bridges, H. A. Haus, Elizabeth George, H. A. Haus, H.L. Ravn, C. Richard‐Serre, P. Baumann and Alexander Huck and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

In The Last Decade

P. W. Hoff

11 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
P. W. Hoff United States	9	220	198	145	35	30	11	325
M. V. McCusker United States	12	284 1.3×	176 0.9×	177 1.2×	29 0.8×	15 0.5×	18	405
Robert E. Gleason United States	7	223 1.0×	157 0.8×	144 1.0×	20 0.6×	22 0.7×	14	336
George A. Hart United States	10	239 1.1×	205 1.0×	152 1.0×	47 1.3×	10 0.3×	18	389
M. Stockton United States	8	298 1.4×	90 0.5×	95 0.7×	24 0.7×	31 1.0×	9	361
C. Duzy United States	12	241 1.1×	201 1.0×	146 1.0×	46 1.3×	4 0.1×	20	343
F. F. Rieke United States	2	137 0.6×	70 0.4×	42 0.3×	23 0.7×	38 1.3×	2	197
В. Н. Ищенко Russia	14	323 1.5×	165 0.8×	169 1.2×	28 0.8×	8 0.3×	53	426
B. Chéron France	11	287 1.3×	53 0.3×	70 0.5×	35 1.0×	11 0.4×	33	327
A. Mann Germany	9	220 1.0×	76 0.4×	67 0.5×	30 0.9×	105 3.5×	14	353
M. A. Gardner United States	7	218 1.0×	52 0.3×	94 0.6×	14 0.4×	30 1.0×	12	293

Countries citing papers authored by P. W. Hoff

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. W. Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. W. Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. W. Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. W. Hoff

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. W. Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. W. Hoff. The network helps show where P. W. Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. W. Hoff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. W. Hoff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. W. Hoff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. W. Hoff. P. W. Hoff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Baumann, P., Alexander Huck, G. Klotz, et al.. (1994). Beta decay properties ofSe67,68and the astrophysicalrp-process path. Physical Review C. 50(2). 1180–1184. 23 indexed citations

2.

George, E. M., et al.. (1977). Radiative and kinetic mechanisms in bound-free excimer lasers. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 13(9). 769–783. 84 indexed citations

3.

Hoff, P. W., et al.. (1974). Dynamic model of high pressure UV lasers. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 10(9). 775–775. 1 indexed citations

4.

George, Elizabeth, et al.. (1974). Dynamic model of high-pressure rare-gas excimer lasers. Applied Physics Letters. 25(4). 235–238. 31 indexed citations

5.

Hoff, P. W., et al.. (1973). Demonstration of temporal coherence, spatial coherence, and threshold effects in the molecular xenon laser. Optics Communications. 8(2). 128–131. 30 indexed citations

6.

Hoff, P. W., et al.. (1973). Measurement of the spectrum of a helical TEA CO2 laser. Applied Physics Letters. 22(12). 680–682. 12 indexed citations

7.

Hoff, P. W., et al.. (1973). Observations of stimulated emission from high-pressure krypton and argon/xenon mixtures. Applied Physics Letters. 23(5). 245–246. 98 indexed citations

8.

Hoff, P. W., et al.. (1972). Short pulses from cavity-dumped CO₂TEA laser. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 8(6). 599–599. 4 indexed citations

9.

Hoff, P. W., H. A. Haus, & Thomas J. Bridges. (1970). Observation of Optical Nutation in an Active Medium. Physical Review Letters. 25(2). 82–84. 15 indexed citations

10.

Bridges, Thomas J., H. A. Haus, & P. W. Hoff. (1968). Small-signal step response of laser amplifiers and measurement of CO<inf>2</inf>laser linewidth. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 4(11). 777–782. 15 indexed citations

11.

Bridges, Thomas J., H. A. Haus, & P. W. Hoff. (1968). CO2 LASER LINEWIDTH BY MEASUREMENT OF STEP RESPONSE. Applied Physics Letters. 13(9). 316–318. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact