Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Global products of vegetation leaf area and fraction absorbed PAR from year one of MODIS data
20021.6k citationsRanga B. Myneni, P. Votava et al.Remote Sensing of Environmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of P. Votava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Votava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Votava more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Votava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Votava. The network helps show where P. Votava may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Votava
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Votava.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Votava based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P. Votava. P. Votava is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Votava, P., et al.. (2016). GeoNotebook: Browser based Interactive analysis and visualization workflow for very large climate and geospatial datasets. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2016.3 indexed citations
Melton, Forrest, A. Michaelis, R. R. Nemani, et al.. (2011). Web Services for Satellite Irrigation Monitoring and Management Support. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2011.1 indexed citations
6.
Nemani, R. R., P. Votava, A. Michaelis, Forrest Melton, & C. Milesi. (2011). NASA Earth Exchange: Next Generation Earth Science Collaborative. AGUFM. 2011.2 indexed citations
Hashimoto, Hirofumi, et al.. (2010). Characterizing uncertainties in recent trends of global terrestrial net primary production through ensemble modeling. AGUFM. 2010.3 indexed citations
9.
Nemani, R. R., P. Votava, A. Michaelis, et al.. (2010). NASA Earth Exchange: A Collaborative Earth Science Platform. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010.4 indexed citations
Bhaduri, Kanishka, Kamalika Das, & P. Votava. (2010). Distributed Anomaly Detection using Satellite Data From Multiple Modalitie.. 109–123.8 indexed citations
12.
Dungan, Jennifer, et al.. (2010). Sources of Uncertainty in Predicting Land Surface Fluxes Using Diverse Data and Models. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
13.
Ganguly, Sangram, Jennifer Dungan, Feng Gao, et al.. (2009). Mapping vegetation Leaf Area Index globally at 30m using Landsat/Global Land Survey data. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009.1 indexed citations
Ichii, Kazuhito, Michael A. White, Hirofumi Hashimoto, et al.. (2006). Develop a Continental-scale Measure of Gross Primary Production by Combining MODIS and AmeriFlux Data through Support Vector Machine. AGUFM. 2006.2 indexed citations
Votava, P., et al.. (2002). Distributed Application Framework for Earth Science Data Processing. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002.4 indexed citations
20.
Votava, P., et al.. (2002). Terrestrial Observation and Prediction System: Integration of satellite and surface weather observations with ecosystem models. AGUFM. 2002.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.