P. Sandler

627 total citations
9 papers, 551 citations indexed

About

P. Sandler is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, P. Sandler has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 551 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Organic Chemistry and 3 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in P. Sandler's work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers). P. Sandler is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (7 papers), Fullerene Chemistry and Applications (3 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers). P. Sandler collaborates with scholars based in Israel, Poland and United States. P. Sandler's co-authors include V. Buch, Joanna Sadlej, Chava Lifshitz, Cornelius E. Klots, Joon Jung, M. M. Szczȩśniak, Julia Laskin, David C. Clary, Thomas Weiske and Jing Sun and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

P. Sandler

9 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
P. Sandler Israel	9	378	161	155	135	101	9	551
Z. Shi United States	10	399 1.1×	177 1.1×	144 0.9×	41 0.3×	217 2.1×	12	656
Azzedine Lakhlifi France	13	347 0.9×	112 0.7×	105 0.7×	31 0.2×	105 1.0×	46	522
Jan K. Kazimirski Israel	8	573 1.5×	69 0.4×	232 1.5×	42 0.3×	225 2.2×	11	710
Michael S. Bergren United States	10	254 0.7×	130 0.8×	156 1.0×	25 0.2×	144 1.4×	15	498
A. Prakash United States	5	214 0.6×	151 0.9×	120 0.8×	23 0.2×	58 0.6×	6	402
D. Fabre France	12	194 0.5×	136 0.8×	54 0.3×	82 0.6×	166 1.6×	29	488
Stanislav Kedžuch Slovakia	9	457 1.2×	100 0.6×	133 0.9×	44 0.3×	162 1.6×	13	526
Patricia L. Moore Plummer United States	11	249 0.7×	54 0.3×	218 1.4×	34 0.3×	120 1.2×	27	432
J. E. Cahill United States	11	303 0.8×	195 1.2×	40 0.3×	46 0.3×	121 1.2×	19	514
René Kalus Czechia	16	603 1.6×	125 0.8×	109 0.7×	33 0.2×	165 1.6×	62	757

Countries citing papers authored by P. Sandler

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Sandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Sandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Sandler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Sandler

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Sandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Sandler. The network helps show where P. Sandler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Sandler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Sandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Sandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Sandler. P. Sandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Buch, V., P. Sandler, & Joanna Sadlej. (1998). Simulations of H₂O Solid, Liquid, and Clusters, with an Emphasis on Ferroelectric Ordering Transition in Hexagonal Ice. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 102(44). 8641–8653. 257 indexed citations

Sandler, P., Joanna Sadlej, Tova Feldmann, & V. Buch. (1997). Intramolecular excitations in the H2O⋅⋅CO complex studied by diffusion Monte Carlo and ab initio calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 107(13). 5022–5031. 11 indexed citations

Sandler, P., V. Buch, & Joanna Sadlej. (1996). Ground and excited states of the complex of CO with water: A diffusion Monte Carlo study. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 105(23). 10387–10397. 49 indexed citations

Sandler, P., V. Buch, & David C. Clary. (1994). Calculation of expectation values of molecular systems using diffusion Monte Carlo in conjunction with the finite field method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 101(7). 6353–6355. 22 indexed citations

Sandler, P., Joon Jung, M. M. Szczȩśniak, & V. Buch. (1994). The complex of N2 with H2O, D2O, and HDO: A combined ab initio and diffusion Monte Carlo study. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 101(2). 1378–1391. 53 indexed citations

Lifshitz, Chava, et al.. (1993). Application of thermal kinetics to small carbon ion clusters. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 97(25). 6592–6597. 28 indexed citations

Sandler, P., Chava Lifshitz, & Cornelius E. Klots. (1992). Kinetics of dissociation and thermionic emission in the C60 and C70 molecules. Chemical Physics Letters. 200(5). 445–450. 88 indexed citations

Sandler, P., et al.. (1992). The Application of Thermal Kinetics to Carbon Ion Clusters. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie. 96(9). 1195–1196. 17 indexed citations

Lifshitz, Chava, et al.. (1992). Is the resilience of C+60 towards decomposition a question of time?. Chemical Physics Letters. 200(4). 406–410. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact