Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus—revisited
1972384 citationsC C Bird, Thomas W. McElin et al.American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by P Manalo-Estrella
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of P Manalo-Estrella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P Manalo-Estrella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P Manalo-Estrella more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P Manalo-Estrella
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P Manalo-Estrella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P Manalo-Estrella. The network helps show where P Manalo-Estrella may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P Manalo-Estrella
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P Manalo-Estrella.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P Manalo-Estrella based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with P Manalo-Estrella. P Manalo-Estrella is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Manalo-Estrella, P & Willard A. Fry. (1973). Cytologic diagnosis of lung lesions by bronchial brushing.. PubMed. 3(4). 280–95.2 indexed citations
3.
Taylor, C. Barr, et al.. (1972). Cholesterol and acid mucopolysaccharides in hypercholesteremic rabbits.. PubMed. 94(5). 466–70.7 indexed citations
4.
Bird, C C, Thomas W. McElin, & P Manalo-Estrella. (1972). The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus—revisited. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 112(5). 583–593.384 indexed citations breakdown →
Manalo-Estrella, P, et al.. (1970). The bronchial brushing technique for obtaining cytologic specimens from peripheral lung lesions.. PubMed. 14(1). 25–30.12 indexed citations
8.
Manalo-Estrella, P, et al.. (1970). Female sex hormones. Effect on aortic acid mucopolysaccharides and atherosclerosis in rabbits.. PubMed. 90(2). 129–36.1 indexed citations
9.
Manalo-Estrella, P, et al.. (1967). Histopathologic findings in human aortic media associated with pregnancy.. PubMed. 83(4). 336–41.250 indexed citations
10.
Manalo-Estrella, P, et al.. (1965). Kupffer cell sarcoma of the liver.. PubMed. 36(10). 988–9.1 indexed citations
Manalo-Estrella, P, et al.. (1963). ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN RHESUS MONKEYS. VII. MECHANISM OF HYPERCHOLESTEREMIA: HEPATIC CHOLESTEROLGENESIS AND THE HYPERCHOLESTEREMIC THRESHOLD OF DIETARY CHOLESTEROL.. PubMed. 76. 413–23.3 indexed citations
14.
Taylor, C. Barr, et al.. (1963). ATHEROSCLEROSIS IN RHESUS MONKEYS. V. MARKED DIET-INDUCED HYPERCHOLESTEREMIA WITH XANTHOMATOSIS AND SEVERE ATHEROSCLEROSIS.. PubMed. 76. 239–49.24 indexed citations
15.
Taylor, C. Barr, et al.. (1962). Atherosclerosis in rhesus monkeys. II. Arterial lesions associated with hypercholesteremia induced by dietary fat and cholesterol.. PubMed. 74. 16–34.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.