P. Loveridge

3.2k total citations
22 papers, 108 citations indexed

About

P. Loveridge is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, P. Loveridge has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 108 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 10 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 6 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in P. Loveridge's work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (7 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (6 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers). P. Loveridge is often cited by papers focused on Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (7 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (6 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (6 papers). P. Loveridge collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. P. Loveridge's co-authors include T. Davenne, N. J. Mills, O. Caretta, I. Efthymiopoulos, M. Fitton, C.J. Densham, David Jenkins, A. Fabich, Thomas W. Davies and J. O’Dell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nuclear Materials, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

In The Last Decade

P. Loveridge

17 papers receiving 103 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
P. Loveridge United Kingdom	7	43	35	33	27	17	22	108
E. Pajuste Latvia	6	27 0.6×	12 0.3×	77 2.3×	11 0.4×	17 1.0×	24	110
Zhonghua Qin China	7	80 1.9×	14 0.4×	18 0.5×	27 1.0×	13 0.8×	23	141
Marie-Hélène Aumeunier France	6	54 1.3×	48 1.4×	43 1.3×	23 0.9×	12 0.7×	23	95
E.P. Marriott United States	7	44 1.0×	94 2.7×	139 4.2×	23 0.9×	28 1.6×	19	168
C. Oliver Spain	7	51 1.2×	107 3.1×	62 1.9×	56 2.1×	33 1.9×	32	150
Y. Foucher France	5	15 0.3×	51 1.5×	83 2.5×	56 2.1×	6 0.4×	6	122
R. Zwaska United States	6	22 0.5×	21 0.6×	45 1.4×	9 0.3×	10 0.6×	24	84
R. Veness Switzerland	5	31 0.7×	43 1.2×	14 0.4×	6 0.2×	49 2.9×	39	109
C.J. Densham United Kingdom	6	25 0.6×	29 0.8×	20 0.6×	14 0.5×	33 1.9×	11	74
D. Loesser United States	5	33 0.8×	18 0.5×	46 1.4×	12 0.4×	23 1.4×	12	74

Countries citing papers authored by P. Loveridge

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Loveridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Loveridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Loveridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Loveridge

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Loveridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Loveridge. The network helps show where P. Loveridge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. Loveridge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. Loveridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. Loveridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. Loveridge. P. Loveridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Škoro, G., et al.. (2024). Simulated and measured performance of the ISIS TS-1 Project target. Journal of Neutron Research. 26(2-3). 47–58.

Loveridge, P., et al.. (2020). Measurement of residual strain in tantalum-clad tungsten after hot isostatic pressing. Journal of Neutron Research. 22(2-3). 287–297. 1 indexed citations

Hurh, P., R. Zwaska, Mark Butcher, et al.. (2019). Thermal shock experiment of beryllium exposed to intense high energy proton beam pulses. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 22(4). 7 indexed citations

Davenne, T., P. Loveridge, R. Bingham, et al.. (2018). Observed proton beam induced disruption of a tungsten powder sample at CERN. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 21(7). 4 indexed citations

Caretta, O., P. Loveridge, J. O’Dell, et al.. (2018). Proton beam induced dynamics of tungsten granules. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 21(3). 7 indexed citations

Loveridge, P., et al.. (2017). Stress levels and failure modes of tantalum-clad tungsten targets at ISIS. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 506. 76–82. 15 indexed citations

Davenne, T. & P. Loveridge. (2016). Propagation of elastic pressure waves in a beam window. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 19(9). 3 indexed citations

Davenne, T., O. Caretta, C. Densham, et al.. (2015). Segmented beryllium target for a 2 MW super beam facility. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 18(9). 3 indexed citations

Davenne, T., C. Densham, M. Fitton, et al.. (2014). Response of a tungsten powder target to an incident high energy proton beam. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 17(10). 11 indexed citations

10.

Charitonidis, N., I. Efthymiopoulos, A. Fabich, et al.. (2013). A FEASIBILITY EXPERIMENT OF A W-POWDER TARGET IN THE HIRADMAT FACILITY AT CERN. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

11.

Caretta, O., T. Davenne, P. Loveridge, & C.J. Densham. (2012). Engineering considerations on targets for a Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 433(1-3). 538–542. 5 indexed citations

12.

Hurh, P., O. Caretta, T. Davenne, et al.. (2011). HIGH-POWER TARGETS: EXPERIENCE AND R&D FOR 2 MW*. arXiv (Cornell University).

13.

Efthymiopoulos, I., N. Charitonidis, T. Davenne, et al.. (2011). Feasibility Experiment Of Granular Target Options for Future Neutrino Facilities. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).

14.

Densham, C.J., et al.. (2009). The Potential of Fluidised Powder Target Technology in High Power Accelerator Facilities. 8 indexed citations

15.

Tsang, T., I. Efthymiopoulos, A. Fabich, et al.. (2008). The MERIT High-Power Target Experiment at the CERN PS.. 12 indexed citations

16.

Fabich, A., J. Lettry, F. Haug, et al.. (2008). The MERIT (nTOF-11) High Intensity Liquid Mercury Target Experiment at the CERN PS. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 3 indexed citations

17.

Loveridge, P., D.E. Baynham, C.J. Densham, A. Devred, & D. Leroy. (2008). Mechanical Design of the Next European Dipole. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity. 18(2). 1487–1490. 1 indexed citations

18.

Kirk, H., T. Tsang, A. Fabich, et al.. (2007). A high-power target experiment at the CERN PS. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 646–648. 5 indexed citations

19.

Barber, G., N. H. Brook, W. Cameron, et al.. (2006). Glass-coated beryllium mirrors for the LHCb RICH1 detector. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 570(3). 565–572. 5 indexed citations

20.

Loveridge, P. & N. J. Mills. (1991). The Mechanism of the Recovery of Impacted High Density Polyethylene Foam. Cellular Polymers. 10(5). 393–405. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact