Owen N. Beck

970 total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 615 citations indexed

About

Owen N. Beck is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Owen N. Beck has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 615 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 6 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 5 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Owen N. Beck's work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (9 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (5 papers). Owen N. Beck is often cited by papers focused on Muscle activation and electromyography studies (17 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (9 papers) and Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (5 papers). Owen N. Beck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. Owen N. Beck's co-authors include Gregory S. Sawicki, Aaron J. Young, Inseung Kang, Alena M. Grabowski, Richard W. Nuckols, Paolo Taboga, Jason R. Franz, Taylor J. M. Dick, Lena H. Ting and Giovanni Martino and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Neurophysiology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Owen N. Beck

17 papers receiving 611 citations

Hit Papers

The exoskeleton expansion... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Owen N. Beck United States 10 543 154 131 89 64 18 615
Richard W. Nuckols United States 12 462 0.9× 174 1.1× 60 0.5× 66 0.7× 81 1.3× 19 524
Denise Martineli Rossi Brazil 13 388 0.7× 123 0.8× 59 0.5× 95 1.1× 74 1.2× 30 601
Karen N. Gregorczyk United States 13 417 0.8× 161 1.0× 65 0.5× 81 0.9× 26 0.4× 22 547
Brian S. Baum United States 15 477 0.9× 128 0.8× 284 2.2× 90 1.0× 65 1.0× 31 704
Samuel Galle Belgium 12 817 1.5× 276 1.8× 61 0.5× 135 1.5× 129 2.0× 17 851
Logan Wade United Kingdom 10 287 0.5× 52 0.3× 202 1.5× 104 1.2× 47 0.7× 26 496
Maarten Afschrift Belgium 13 305 0.6× 58 0.4× 50 0.4× 168 1.9× 89 1.4× 27 388
Friso Hagman Belgium 11 292 0.5× 52 0.3× 285 2.2× 74 0.8× 38 0.6× 16 506
Laurie Needham United Kingdom 9 227 0.4× 50 0.3× 148 1.1× 109 1.2× 46 0.7× 24 431
Pedro Fonseca Portugal 11 167 0.3× 64 0.4× 214 1.6× 55 0.6× 30 0.5× 65 451

Countries citing papers authored by Owen N. Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Owen N. Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Owen N. Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Owen N. Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Owen N. Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Owen N. Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Owen N. Beck. The network helps show where Owen N. Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Owen N. Beck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Owen N. Beck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Owen N. Beck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Owen N. Beck. Owen N. Beck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Martino, Giovanni, et al.. (2024). Center of mass states render multijoint torques throughout standing balance recovery. Journal of Neurophysiology. 133(1). 206–221.
2.
Fallah, Nader & Owen N. Beck. (2024). The metabolic cost of producing joint moments is greater at the hip than at the ankle. Journal of Experimental Biology. 228(2). 1 indexed citations
3.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2024). Habitually wearing high heels may improve user walking economy in any footwear. Journal of Applied Physiology. 136(3). 567–572. 1 indexed citations
4.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2023). Exoskeletons need to react faster than physiological responses to improve standing balance. Science Robotics. 8(75). eadf1080–eadf1080. 49 indexed citations
5.
Martino, Giovanni, Owen N. Beck, & Lena H. Ting. (2023). Voluntary muscle coactivation in quiet standing elicits reciprocal rather than coactive agonist-antagonist control of reactive balance. Journal of Neurophysiology. 129(6). 1378–1388. 7 indexed citations
6.
Zhang, Janet H., et al.. (2023). Equivalent running leg lengths require prosthetic legs to be longer than biological legs during standing. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 7679–7679. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kipp, Shalaya, et al.. (2023). It is time to abandon single-value oxygen uptake energy equivalents. Journal of Applied Physiology. 134(4). 887–890. 4 indexed citations
8.
Beck, Owen N., Paolo Taboga, & Alena M. Grabowski. (2022). Sprinting with prosthetic versus biological legs: insight from experimental data. Royal Society Open Science. 9(1). 211799–211799. 12 indexed citations
9.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2022). Shorter muscle fascicle operating lengths increase the metabolic cost of cyclic force production. Journal of Applied Physiology. 133(3). 524–533. 27 indexed citations
10.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2021). Reduced Achilles Tendon Stiffness Disrupts Calf Muscle Neuromechanics in Elderly Gait. Gerontology. 68(3). 241–251. 29 indexed citations
11.
Sawicki, Gregory S., Owen N. Beck, Inseung Kang, & Aaron J. Young. (2020). The exoskeleton expansion: improving walking and running economy. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 17(1). 25–25. 266 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2020). Added lower limb mass does not affect biomechanical asymmetry but increases metabolic power in runners with a unilateral transtibial amputation. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 120(6). 1449–1456. 4 indexed citations
13.
Nuckols, Richard W., Taylor J. M. Dick, Owen N. Beck, & Gregory S. Sawicki. (2020). Ultrasound imaging links soleus muscle neuromechanics and energetics during human walking with elastic ankle exoskeletons. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 3604–3604. 54 indexed citations
14.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2020). Cyclically producing the same average muscle-tendon force with a smaller duty increases metabolic rate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 287(1933). 20200431–20200431. 30 indexed citations
15.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2019). Exoskeletons Improve Locomotion Economy by Reducing Active Muscle Volume. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 47(4). 237–245. 36 indexed citations
16.
Beck, Owen N., et al.. (2018). Step time asymmetry increases metabolic energy expenditure during running. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 118(10). 2147–2154. 33 indexed citations
17.
Beck, Owen N. & Alena M. Grabowski. (2017). The biomechanics of the fastest sprinter with a unilateral transtibial amputation. Journal of Applied Physiology. 124(3). 641–645. 9 indexed citations
18.
Beck, Owen N., Paolo Taboga, & Alena M. Grabowski. (2016). Characterizing the Mechanical Properties of Running-Specific Prostheses. PLoS ONE. 11(12). e0168298–e0168298. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026