Otto Schreier

1.1k total citations
3 papers, 17 citations indexed

About

Otto Schreier is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Otto Schreier has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 17 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Geometry and Topology, 1 paper in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 1 paper in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Otto Schreier's work include Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (1 paper) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (1 paper). Otto Schreier is often cited by papers focused on Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (1 paper), Powdery Mildew Fungal Diseases (1 paper) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (1 paper). Otto Schreier collaborates with scholars based in . Otto Schreier's co-authors include Emanuel Sperner and Hans Wenzl and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Pest Science, CERN Bulletin and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

Otto Schreier

1 paper receiving 15 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Otto Schreier 2 5 4 3 3 2 3 17
Dorothy L. Bernstein United States 3 4 0.8× 4 1.0× 1 0.3× 5 2.5× 6 13
Hellmuth Kneser Germany 2 3 0.6× 3 0.8× 8 2.7× 2 0.7× 8 4.0× 6 15
Francesco Severi 3 3 0.6× 5 1.3× 18 6.0× 2 0.7× 3 1.5× 8 24
Felix Behrend Australia 4 3 0.6× 6 2.0× 1 0.3× 4 2.0× 8 28
Rudolph Carnap 2 6 1.2× 2 19
Léopold Kronecker 2 3 0.6× 1 0.3× 7 2.3× 5 1.7× 1 0.5× 2 13
J. v. Neumann 2 6 1.2× 10 2.5× 4 1.3× 11 5.5× 2 18
J. M. Kohli Russia 2 4 0.8× 2 0.5× 7 2.3× 5 1.7× 5 2.5× 4 18
W. Mader Germany 2 8 1.6× 3 1.0× 1 0.5× 2 9
Ott‐Heinrích Keller 3 4 0.8× 9 2.3× 20 6.7× 5 1.7× 12 6.0× 9 34

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Schreier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Schreier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Schreier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Schreier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Schreier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Schreier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Schreier. The network helps show where Otto Schreier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Otto Schreier

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Otto Schreier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Otto Schreier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Otto Schreier. Otto Schreier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
1.
Wenzl, Hans & Otto Schreier. (1953). Spinnmilbenschäden (Tetranychus althaeae v. Hanst.) an Zuckerrübe. Journal of Pest Science. 26(4). 49–51. 1 indexed citations
2.
Schreier, Otto, et al.. (1952). Wichtige Krankheiten und Schädlinge im Getreidebau. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
3.
Schreier, Otto & Emanuel Sperner. (1951). Introduction to modern algebra and matrix theory. CERN Bulletin. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026